Hybrid Modeling of Methanol to Olefin Reaction Kinetics Based on the Artificial Neural Network

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Chengyu [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Sun, Yanji [2 ]
Pan, Yanqiu [1 ]
Feng, Siyao [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Puluoshuzhi Technol Co Ltd, Res Inst Energy Chem Ind, Beijing 100095, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
REACTION-MECHANISM; HYDROCARBON FORMATION; CO-REACTION; CONVERSION; SAPO-34; DEACTIVATION; CRACKING; CATALYSTS; INSIGHTS; PROPENE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Methanol to olefin (MTO) is an important coal-based process to ensure olefin yield. The current reaction kinetics model as a crucial tool of process regulation lacks real-time, accuracy, and simplicity in describing the catalyst deactivation. To fill in the gap, a reaction kinetics hybrid model of MTO was developed by a machine learning approach. Specifically, a catalyst deactivation model was first built by an artificial neural network (ANN) and then integrated into a lump-based reaction kinetics model over a fresh SAPO-34 catalyst. Reaction kinetics parameters were estimated by the genetic algorithm. A priori knowledge was extracted by analyzing the deactivation experimental data and used in the training of ANN to enhance its extrapolability. The developed model of MTO agreed well with the kinetics experimental data considering the catalyst deactivation. The model provided a satisfactory predictive performance. Results show that a higher reaction temperature, longer reaction space time, and shorter catalyst residence time are beneficial to the yield of ethylene and propylene. The hybrid model developed in this work is expected to apply to the process control of MTO. The proposed hybrid modeling approach could be used as theoretical guidance for other catalytic reaction kinetics modeling.
引用
收藏
页码:5065 / 5077
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial neural network based hybrid modeling approach for flood inundation modeling
    Xie, Shuai
    Wu, Wenyan
    Mooser, Sebastian
    Wang, Q. J.
    Nathan, Rory
    Huang, Yuefei
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592 (592)
  • [2] Artificial neural network modeling of methanol production from syngas
    Ye, Jiansen
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 37 (06) : 629 - 632
  • [3] Modeling biodegradation and kinetics of glyphosate by artificial neural network
    Nourouzi, Mohsen M.
    Chuah, Teong G.
    Choong, Thomas S. Y.
    Rabiei, F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2012, 47 (05) : 455 - 465
  • [4] Modeling of Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Using the Artificial Neural Network
    Tafazoli, Mehdi
    Baseri, Hamid
    Alizadeh, Ebrahim
    Shakeri, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF FUEL CELL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 10 (04):
  • [5] Artificial Neural Network based CNTFETs Modeling
    Zhang, Ji
    Chang, Sheng
    Wang, Hao
    He, Jin
    Huang, Qijun
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTERS, ELECTRONICS AND MECHATRONICS, 2014, 667 : 390 - 395
  • [6] Modeling and simulation of the enzymatic kinetics for the production of Galactooligosaccharides (GOS) using an Artificial Neural Network hybrid model
    Hoyos, Juan D.
    Noriega, Mario A.
    Riascos, Carlos A. M.
    DIGITAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 9
  • [7] Modeling of pneumatic artificial muscle using a hybrid artificial neural network approach
    Song, Chunsheng
    Xie, Shengquan
    Zhou, Zude
    Hu, Yefa
    MECHATRONICS, 2015, 31 : 124 - 131
  • [8] Kinetics of the reaction of olefin synthesis from methanol and dimethyl ether
    E. V. Pisarenko
    V. N. Pisarenko
    Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2008, 42
  • [9] Kinetics of the reaction of olefin synthesis from methanol and dimethyl ether
    Pisarenko, E. V.
    Pisarenko, V. N.
    THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 42 (06) : 822 - 831
  • [10] A hybrid neural network based modeling for hysteresis
    Li, CT
    Tan, YH
    2005 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL & 13TH MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2005, : 53 - 58