Combining Statistical Noise Levels and Application to Wind Farm Guidelines

被引:0
|
作者
Tonin, Renzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Renzo Tonin & Associates, 1-418A Elizabeth St, Surry Hills, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
Ambient noise; Wind farm noise; Statistical noise levels; Logarithmic addition and subtraction of noise levels;
D O I
10.1007/s40857-024-00318-y
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
It is stated in wind farm standards that logarithmic addition and subtraction of LAF90,T sound pressure levels is "not strictly mathematically correct". An analytical and experimental study reported in Tonin 2024 (a related article) examines the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels as a general proposition, particularly the LAF90,T and the LAF10,T. The objective of that study was to explore the accuracy of combining statistical noise levels and what might influence that accuracy. The objective of this study, as foreshadowed in Tonin 2024, is to apply the results to wind farms. It was concluded in Tonin 2024 that values of D90 (being the difference between the logarithmic sum and actual values of LAF90,T) are negative in the range 0 to - 3 dB (for the cases in the study), meaning that the logarithmic sum of LAF90,T for the ambient and source sound pressure level distributions is less than the actual value of LAF90,T for the combined distribution. As a result, in deriving the wind farm noise level (as a contribution), the actual value of LAF90,T will be less than that determined by logarithmic subtraction of the individual components. In respect of the question of the underlying accuracy of combining statistical noise levels for wind farms, it is concluded that the difference between the logarithmic addition of the LAF90,T and the true value is less than 1 dB (for the cases in the study). The results are applied herein to a typical wind farm concluding that the simple energy subtraction method adopted in wind farm guidelines is conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance. It is also concluded that if wind farm guidelines were to assess wind farm noise on the basis of LAeq,T rather than LAF90,T then adding a value of 2.5 dB to the derived wind farm noise level LAF90,T as currently specified in the guidelines (i.e., with D90 = 0 dB) would be conservative even allowing for the hypothesis that the fluctuation strength of wind farm noise is not invariant but increases with distance.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 272
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On combining statistical noise levels
    Tonin, Renzo
    APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2024, 218
  • [2] Modeling and application of statistical indicators for wind farm cluster
    Bian, Haihong
    Zheng, Weigao
    Lin, Zhangsui
    Xu, Qingshan
    Zhang, Le
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2015, 35 (12): : 21 - 27
  • [3] Low frequency noise & vibration levels at a modern wind farm
    Legerton, ML
    Manley, DMJP
    Sargent, JW
    Snow, DJ
    Styles, P
    INTER-NOISE 96 - THE 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING, 25TH ANNIVERSARY CONGRESS - LIVERPOOL, PROCEEDINGS, BOOKS 1-6: NOISE CONTROL - THE NEXT 25 YEARS, 1996, : 459 - 462
  • [4] Wind farm noise
    Doble, Phil
    Engineering and Technology, 2010, 5 (03):
  • [5] WIND FARM NOISE
    Alway, Peter
    ACOUSTICS AUSTRALIA, 2013, 41 (03) : 195 - 195
  • [6] The estimation of noise levels in residual areas surrounding an operating wind farm
    Ziliani, Roberto
    NOISE CONTROL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2011, 59 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [7] Wind Farm Noise - The Debate
    Harding, Graeme E.
    ACOUSTICS AUSTRALIA, 2013, 41 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [8] WIND FARM NOISE AND COST
    RIDDELL, JC
    PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 1994, 7 (09) : 22 - 22
  • [9] COMPARISON OF PREDICTED AND MEASURED WIND FARM NOISE LEVELS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ASSESSMENTS OF NEW WIND FARMS
    Evans, Tom
    Cooper, Jonathan
    ACOUSTICS AUSTRALIA, 2012, 40 (01) : 28 - 36
  • [10] Noise and Infrasonic Noise at Workplaces in a Wind Farm
    Pleban, Dariusz
    Radosz, Jan
    Smagowska, Bozena
    ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS, 2017, 42 (03) : 491 - 498