CH4 emission and conversion from A~2O and SBR processes in full-scale wastewater treatment plants

被引:0
|
作者
Yan Liu [1 ]
Xiang Cheng [1 ]
Xiaoxiu Lun [1 ]
Dezhi Sun [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Beijing Forestry University
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助;
关键词
CH4; emission; production and consumption; wastewater treatment plant; A2O; SBR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X703 [废水的处理与利用];
学科分类号
083002 ;
摘要
Wastewater treatment systems are important anthropogenic sources of CH4emission. A full-scale experiment was carried out to monitor the CH4 emission from anoxic/anaerobic/oxic process(A2O) and sequencing batch reactor(SBR) wastewater treatment plants(WWTPs) for one year from May 2011 to April 2012. The main emission unit of the A2O process was an oxic tank, accounting for 76.2% of CH4emissions; the main emission unit of the SBR process was the feeding and aeration phase, accounting for 99.5% of CH4emissions. CH4can be produced in the anaerobic condition, such as in the primary settling tank and anaerobic tank of the A2O process. While CH4can be consumed in anoxic denitrification or the aeration condition, such as in the anoxic tank and oxic tank of the A2O process and the feeding and aeration phase of the SBR process. The CH4emission flux and the dissolved CH4concentration rapidly decreased in the oxic tank of the A2O process. These metrics increased during the first half of the phase and then decreased during the latter half of the phase in the feeding and aeration phase of the SBR process. The CH4oxidation rate ranged from 32.47% to 89.52%(mean: 67.96%) in the A2O process and from 12.65% to 88.31%(mean: 47.62%) in the SBR process. The mean CH4 emission factors were 0.182 g/ton of wastewater and 24.75 g CH4 /(person·year) for the A2O process, and 0.457 g/ton of wastewater and 36.55 g CH4 /(person·year) for the SBR process.
引用
收藏
页码:224 / 230
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CH4 emission and conversion from A2O and SBR processes in full-scale wastewater treatment plants
    Liu, Yan
    Cheng, Xiang
    Lun, Xiaoxiu
    Sun, Dezhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 26 (01) : 224 - 230
  • [2] N2O emission from full-scale urban wastewater treatment plants: a comparison between A2O and SBR
    Sun, Shichang
    Cheng, Xiang
    Li, Sha
    Qi, Fei
    Liu, Yan
    Sun, Dezhi
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 67 (09) : 1887 - 1893
  • [3] Evaluation of Ecotoxicity of Wastewater from the Full-Scale Treatment Plants
    Liwarska-Bizukojc, Ewa
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (20)
  • [4] Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in three full-scale wastewater treatment processes
    Xu Yan
    Lin Li
    Junxin Liu
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, (02) : 256 - 263
  • [5] Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in three full-scale wastewater treatment processes
    Yan, Xu
    Li, Lin
    Liu, Junxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2014, 26 (02) : 256 - 263
  • [6] Characteristics of greenhouse gas emission in three full-scale wastewater treatment processes
    Xu Yan
    Lin Li
    Junxin Liu
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26 (02) : 256 - 263
  • [7] Microbial communities and interactions in full-scale A2/O and MBR wastewater treatment plants
    Feng, Zhaolu
    Li, Tianle
    Lin, Yang
    Wu, Guangxue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 46
  • [8] Nitrous oxide and methane emissions from different treatment processes in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants
    Ren, Y. G.
    Wang, J. H.
    Li, H. F.
    Zhang, J.
    Qi, P. Y.
    Hu, Z.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 34 (21) : 2917 - 2927
  • [9] Methane emissions from a full-scale A/A/O wastewater treatment plant
    Wang, Jinhe
    Zhang, Jian
    Xie, Huijun
    Qi, Pengyu
    Ren, Yangang
    Hu, Zhen
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 102 (09) : 5479 - 5485
  • [10] Mathematical Modeling of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Emissions from Full-Scale Wastewater Treatment Plants
    Ni, Bing-Jie
    Ye, Liu
    Law, Yingyu
    Byers, Craig
    Yuan, Zhiguo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (14) : 7795 - 7803