THE MOST PROMISING SURROGATE END-POINT BIOMARKERS FOR SCREENING CANDIDATE CHEMOPREVENTIVE COMPOUNDS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA IN SHORT-TERM PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS

被引:0
|
作者
BOSTWICK, DG
BURKE, HB
WHEELER, TM
CHUNG, LWK
BOOKSTEIN, R
PRETLOW, TG
NAGLE, RB
MONTIRONI, R
LIEBER, MM
VELTRI, RW
GRIZZLE, WE
GRIGNON, DJ
机构
[1] UNIV NEVADA, SCH MED, RENO, NV 89520 USA
[2] BAYLOR COLL MED, DEPT PATHOL, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[3] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, UROL RES LAB, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[4] CANJI INC, SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 USA
[5] CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIV, DEPT PATHOL, CLEVELAND, OH 44106 USA
[6] UNIV ARIZONA, ARIZONA HLTH SCI CTR, DEPT PATHOL, TUCSON, AZ 85724 USA
[7] UNIV ANCONA HOSP, INST PATHOL ANAT, ANCONA, ITALY
[8] MAYO CLIN & MAYO FDN, DEPT UROL, ROCHESTER, MN 55905 USA
[9] CYTODIAGNOST INC, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73112 USA
[10] UNIV ALABAMA, DEPT PATHOL, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35294 USA
[11] HARPER GRACE HOSP, DEPT PATHOL, DETROIT, MI 48201 USA
关键词
BIOMARKERS; CHEMOPREVENTION; PREMALIGNANCY; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; RISK STRATIFICATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) are needed in clinical chemoprevention trials to avoid the excessively long study periods and high costs associated with the use of cancer incidence reduction as an endpoint, particularly with relatively slow-growing tumors such as prostatic adenocarcinoma. SEBs should be directly associated with the evolution of neoplasia, and develop with high frequency in abnormal cells of susceptible individuals. If SEBs can be modified by a particular intervention regimen in short-term studies, the rationale for carrying out long-term studies may be strengthened. The consensus panel identified a small and manageable group of biomarkers measured in tissue or serum as the most promising; in prostate cancer chemoprevention, including (1) prostate specific antigen (PSA); (2) morphometric markers, such as nuclear size and roundness; (3) proliferation markers, such as MIB-1 and PCNA; (4) uclear DNA content (ploidy); (5) oncogene c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) expression; (6) angiogenesis; and (7) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Information regarding many of these and other biomarkers is limited, calling for further investigation. Also, these factors, chosen chiefly for their proven or proposed utility as prognostic factors, may be less useful as SEBs. It was agreed that concurrent study of numerous markers rather than single markers allows comparison of their relative utility,, including assessment of ease of quantitation and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:283 / 289
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条