CONTROL OF GASTRIC PH WITH RANITIDINE IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS - COMPARISON OF 2 INTRAVENOUS REGIMENS

被引:15
|
作者
SANTUCCI, L
FIORUCCI, S
PELLI, MA
CALDERAZZO, A
BIASINI, E
CALDERAZZO, PL
MORELLI, A
机构
[1] UNIV PERUGIA,MONTELUCE POLICLIN,IST GASTROENTEROL & ENDOSCOPIA DIGEST,I-06100 PERUGIA,ITALY
[2] UNIV PERUGIA,MONTELUCE POLICLIN,UNITA ANESTESIA & RIANIMAZ,I-06100 PERUGIA,ITALY
关键词
STRESS ULCER; H2; ANTAGONISTS; PH-METRY;
D O I
10.1007/BF01297023
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The effects of continuous versus bolus administration of ranitidine on gastric pH were compared in critically ill patients admitted to our intensive care unit. Patients were randomized to receive 0.2 mg/kg/hr ranitidine in continuous infusion or 50 mg in bolus every 4 hr. The pH was monitored throughout a 24-hr period, 2 hr in basal conditions and 22 hr during treatment, with a gastric probe. Basal gastric pH was 2.1 +/- 0.2 in the infused and 2.4 +/- 0.2 in the bolus group (P > 0.05). The hydrogen ion concentrations were 25.1 +/- 8 and 20.0 +/- 7 mmol/liter, respectively (P > 0.05). After ranitidine administration, mean pH was 6.3 +/- 0.6 in patients treated by infusion and 4.5 +/- 0.5 (P < 0.001) in those who received the drug in bolus; hydrogen ion concentration was 2.5 +/- 2 and 6.9 +/- 6, respectively, (P < 0.001). Percent of inhibition of acid secretion was 90% in the infused and 68% in the bolus group. Infusion raised pH to values constantly above 4, whereas bolus administration resulted in wide fluctuations. These data indicate that continuous infusion of ranitidine is superior to bolus administration in controlling gastric acidity in critically ill patients.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:583 / 587
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gastric pH control in critically ill children receiving intravenous ranitidine
    Harrison, AM
    Lugo, RA
    Vernon, DD
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 26 (08) : 1433 - 1436
  • [2] Gastric pH and intravenous ranitidine in critically ill children
    López-Herce, J
    Vicente, PE
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (01) : 288 - 289
  • [3] Gastric pH and intravenous ranitidine in critically ill children - Reply
    Harrison, AM
    Lugo, RA
    Vernon, DD
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (01) : 289 - 289
  • [4] Effect of ranitidine on gastric intramucosal pH in critically ill patients
    Calvet, X
    Baigorri, F
    Duarte, M
    Saura, P
    Royo, C
    Joseph, D
    Mas, A
    Artigas, A
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [5] Effect of ranitidine on gastric intramucosal pH in critically ill patients
    X. Calvet
    F. Baigorri
    M. Duarte
    P. Saura
    C. Royo
    D. Joseph
    A. Mas
    A. Artigas
    Intensive Care Medicine, 1998, 24 : 12 - 17
  • [6] Randomized comparison of gastric pH control with ranitidine, esomeprazole and pantoprazole for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients
    Kalaghchi, B
    Ghandi, M
    Hoque, ME
    Henderson, T
    Adams, RG
    Thomas, AV
    Smoot, DT
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A445 - A445
  • [7] COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS FAMOTIDINE AND RANITIDINE IN SUPPRESSING GASTRIC-ACID SECRETION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    ALQUORAIN, A
    AMMAR, A
    ALAWAMI, M
    HEGAZI, M
    ELMUNSHID, HA
    IBRAHIM, EM
    ALMUEZEN, Y
    NASSIM, F
    ALGINDAN, Y
    ALFREIHI, H
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1994, 55 (10): : 1263 - 1270
  • [8] COMPARISON OF AN INTRAVENOUS BOLUS OF FAMOTIDINE AND MYLANTA-II FOR THE CONTROL OF GASTRIC PH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    WILSON, P
    CLARK, GWB
    ANSELMINO, M
    WELCH, NT
    SINGH, S
    PERDIKIS, G
    HINDER, RA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 166 (06): : 621 - 625
  • [9] THE COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF CIMETIDINE AND RANITIDINE IN CONTROLLING GASTRIC PH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    REID, SR
    BAYLIFF, CD
    CANADIAN ANAESTHETISTS SOCIETY JOURNAL, 1986, 33 (03) : 287 - 293
  • [10] BOLUS OR INFUSION RANITIDINE FOR THE CONTROL OF INTRAGASTRIC PH IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS
    MORRIS, DL
    MARKHAM, S
    BEACHEY, A
    BYRNE, A
    SUMMERS, K
    LEWIS, PM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1985, 80 (10): : 865 - 865