The periodic health examination: from law to the directive of the German Federal Joint Committee (G-BA)

被引:1
|
作者
Perleth, Matthias [1 ]
Matthias, Katja [1 ]
机构
[1] Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Abt Fachberatung Med, Wegelystr 8, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Periodic health examination; secondary prevention; German Federal Joint Committee; directive; Social Code Book V;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2014.02.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Since 1989 a periodic health examination beginning at the age of 35 for the early detection of "common diseases" (especially cardiovascular and kidney diseases as well as diabetes) by means of history-taking, physical examination, blood and urine tests and counselling has been available in Germany. Altogether, the respective directive of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) was revised six times, but a substantive change took place only once (i. e., the cancellation of uric acid, creatinine, and resting ECG in 1999). However, additional examinations (e.g., glaucoma screening) were not added to the health check after systematic assessments of the evidence were completed. In the mid-1990s, several evaluations were performed which showed that new diagnoses were established in a significant proportion of patients, and measures were initiated such as nutrition counselling. A patient-relevant benefit in terms of avoided adverse events (such as heart attacks) could, however, not be demonstrated due to methodological reasons. Criticism of the health examination is not new, in particular concerning the lack of evidence of benefit for the diagnostic procedures of the health examination. A draft law issued by the former Federal Government proposing an amendment to the health examination has recently been rejected in the Bundesrat (upper house of the German parliament).
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 195
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Die NIPT-Entscheidung des G-BA. Eine ethische AnalyseThe decision of the German Federal Joint Committee to cover NIPT in mandatory health insurance. An ethical analysis
    Christoph Rehmann-Sutter
    Christina Schües
    Ethik in der Medizin, 2020, 32 : 385 - 403
  • [32] The decision of the German Federal Joint Committee to cover NIPT in mandatory health insurance. An ethical analysis
    Rehmann-Sutter, Christoph
    Schues, Christina
    ETHIK IN DER MEDIZIN, 2020, 32 (04) : 385 - 403
  • [33] Analysis of a Family-centred Care Programme with Follow-up Home-visits in Neonatology - In Times of the Directive from G-BA
    Huening, B. M.
    Reimann, M.
    Sahlmen, S.
    Leibold, S.
    Nabring, J. C.
    Felderhoff-Mueser, U.
    KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 2016, 228 (04): : 195 - 201
  • [34] Patientenbeteiligung in den Strukturen des Gemeinsamen BundesausschussesPatients' participation in the federal joint committee of the German health care system
    Stefan Etgeton
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 2009, 52 : 104 - 110
  • [35] Who is the top dog in German health care system? Germany's Federal Ministry of Health is not allowed to enjoin on Federal Joint Committee which drugs should be reimbursable
    Egidi G.
    Schaaber J.
    Zeitschrift für Allgemeinmedizin, 2016, 92 (3): : 128 - 130
  • [36] From the DGIM Committees Working Group IQWiG, G-BA, IQTIG Services in our Health System: Information, Financing, Quality
    不详
    INTERNIST, 2019, 60 (03): : 288 - 290
  • [37] The MDK as an Institution for Quality Assurance in the German Health System: A Practice Report on Quality Audits Based on the Guideline on Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Interventions of the G-BA
    Ritter, Sebastian
    Lehr, Frauke
    Gaertner, Thomas
    van Essen, Joerg
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2020, 82 (07) : 578 - 583
  • [38] Joint Statement of the German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive- and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) and the German Society of Internal Medicine (DGIM) on the Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir-Benefit Assessment in accordance with 35a SGB V of the G-BA
    Berg, Thomas
    Zeuzem, Stefan
    Manns, Michael P.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2015, 53 (05): : 519 - 523
  • [39] TRENDS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA) RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE UK AND GERMANY a(sic)" A COMPARISON OF G-BA, SMC AND NICE SINGLE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL DECISIONS
    Hill, C. A.
    Hill, D.
    Marshall, J. D.
    Harries, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A94 - A95
  • [40] Is the Quality Guideline of Care Delivery of Preterm and Mature Infants (QFR-RL) of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) a Quality Risk? An Analysis of the Fulfillment Rate and the Consequences for Care Delivery to Other IC Patients and Imminent Premature Infants at a Regional Network of Perinatal Centers
    Kleeberg, Markus
    Beckmann, Matthias
    Fusch, Christoph
    Hanf, Volker
    Kainer, Franz
    Klinge, Jens
    Koehler, Wolfgang
    Morhart, Patrick
    Schroth, Michael Andreas
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND NEONATOLOGIE, 2020, 224 (05): : 281 - 288