THE NEXT STEP IN THE ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF RESTRICTED DISTRIBUTION - PER SE LEGALITY

被引：123

|

作者：

POSNER, RA

机构：

来源：

UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW | 1981年 / 48卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1599350

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：6 / 26

页数：21

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] ANTITRUST TREATMENT OF COMPETITIVE TORTS - AN ARGUMENT FOR A RULE OF PER SE LEGALITY UNDER THE SHERMAN ACT
MCBREARTY, ME
[J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1980, 58 (02) : 415 - 434
[2] Per Se Treatment: An Unnecessary Relic of Antitrust Litigation
Weg, Adam
[J]. HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 60 (06) : 1535 - +
[3] ANTITRUST STANDING, ANTITRUST INJURY, AND THE PER SE STANDARD
RICHMAN, DC
[J]. YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1984, 93 (07): : 1309 - 1329
[4] THE TRANSFORMATION OF VERTICAL RESTRAINTS: PER SE ILLEGALITY, THE RULE OF REASON, AND PER SE LEGALITY
Sokol, D. Daniel
[J]. ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, 2014, 79 (03) : 1003 - 1016
[5] THE FUTURE OF PER SE IN ANTITRUST-LAW
VANCISE, JG
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1964, 50 (07) : 1165 - 1177
[6] ANTITRUST - LIMITATION ON THE GROUP BOYCOTT PER SE RULE
不详
[J]. DUKE LAW JOURNAL, 1961, (04): : 606 - 613
[7] Whistling Past the Graveyard: The Problem with the Per Se Legality Treatment of Pay-for-Delay Settlements
Kades, Michael
[J]. COMPETITION POLICY INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 5 (02): : 143 - 163
[8] THE PER SE DOCTRINE - AN EMERGING PHILOSOPHY OF ANTITRUST-LAW
VONKALINOWSKI, JO
[J]. UCLA LAW REVIEW, 1964, 11 (04) : 569 - 592
[9] RECONCILING THE PER SE AND RULE OF REASON APPROACHES TO ANTITRUST ANALYSIS
PIRAINO, TA
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1991, 64 (03) : 685 - 739
[10] THE NEW ANTITRUST ILLEGALITY PER SE: FORESTALLING AND PATENT MISUSE
Schueller, George H.
[J]. COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1950, 50 (02) : 170 - 200

← 1 2 3 4 5 →