MACHINE LEARNING IN CONTROL OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION SYSTEMS FOR LOCOMOTION

被引:77
|
作者
KOSTOV, A
ANDREWS, BJ
POPOVIC, DB
STEIN, RB
ARMSTRONG, WW
机构
[1] UNIV BELGRADE, FAC ELECT ENGN, BELGRADE, YUGOSLAVIA
[2] UNIV MIAMI, COLL ENGN, MIAMI PROJECT, MIAMI, FL USA
[3] UNIV ALBERTA, DEPT COMP SCI, EDMONTON, AB T6G 2S2, CANADA
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1109/10.387193
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Two machine learning techniques were evaluated for automatic design of a rule-based control of functional electrical stimulation (FES) for locomotion of spinal cord injured humans, The task was to learn the invariant characteristics of the relationship between sensory information and the FES-control signal by using off-line supervised training, Sensory signals were recorded using pressure sensors installed in the insoles of a subject's shoes and goniometers attached across the joints of the affected leg, The ITS-control consisted of pulses corresponding to time intervals when the subject pressed on the manual pushbutton to deliver the stimulation during FES-assisted ambulation, The machine learning techniques used were the adaptive logic network (ALN) [1] and the inductive learning algorithm (IL) [2], Results to date suggest that, given the same training data, the IL learned faster than the ALN, while both performed the test rapidly. The generalization was estimated by measuring the test errors and it was better with an ALN, especially if past points were used to reflect the time dimension, Both techniques were able to predict future stimulation events, An advantage of the ALN over the IL was that ALN's can be retrained with new data without losing previously collected knowledge, The advantages of the IL over the ALN were that the IL produces small, explicit, comprehensible trees and that the relative importance of each sensory contribution can be quantified.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 551
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION FOR CONTROL OF LOCOMOTOR SYSTEMS
    VODOVNIK, L
    BAJD, T
    KRALJ, A
    GRACANIN, F
    STROJNIK, P
    [J]. CRC CRITICAL REVIEWS IN BIOENGINEERING, 1981, 6 (02): : 63 - 131
  • [2] FINITE-STATE MODEL OF LOCOMOTION FOR FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION SYSTEMS
    POPOVIC, DB
    [J]. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH, 1993, 97 : 397 - 407
  • [3] LOCOMOTION EVOKED BY ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE HYPOTHALAMUS
    VANDERPOEL, AM
    MOS, J
    KRUK, MR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1983, 137 (SEP) : 435 - 435
  • [4] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION FOR THE CONTROL OF THE UPPER EXTREMITIES
    HANDA, Y
    HOSHIMIYA, N
    [J]. MEDICAL PROGRESS THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 12 (1-2) : 51 - 63
  • [5] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    GRANT, L
    [J]. IEE REVIEW, 1988, 34 (11): : 443 - 445
  • [6] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    LARSSON, LE
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 1994, : 63 - 72
  • [7] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    WEISS, MS
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 144 (06): : 738 - 738
  • [8] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    GRANT, L
    SWAIN, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 9 (03) : 129 - 131
  • [9] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    DAGAN, J
    LOMES, A
    ALON, G
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 17 (12): : 1202 - 1202
  • [10] FUNCTIONAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    SHERWOOD, AM
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 2 (04): : 544 - 546