THE EFFECT OF CONSPECIFICS ON HABITAT SELECTION IN TERRITORIAL SPECIES

Despite widespread interest in habitat selection, many of the assumptions about how territorial animals choose habitats have not been tested. This study of juvenile Anolis aeneus lizards focuses on the relationship between the number of previous settlers in a habitat and the subsequent behavior of new arrivals at that habitat. Clearings containing the types of microhabitat preferred by juveniles were established in the field, several juvenile residents were allowed to establish territories in enclosures in the center of each clearing, and then naturally occurring immigrants were allowed access to the empty microhabitat surrounding the enclosures. Arrival rates and the probability of settlement were monitored on a daily basis from the day the first juveniles arrived until several days after the last juvenile had settled (= saturation). In each of seven trials, arrival rates were comparable early and late in the settlement process, and were unrelated to the degree of habitat saturation. Arrival rates did vary on a temporal basis, probably as a result of environmental factors affecting egg laying and hatching schedules, and habitats with high arrival rates saturated more quickly than those with lower arrival rates. All of the individuals arriving at the clearings did not settle, but settlers and non-settlers did not differ with respect to competitive ability, as measured by body size. The probability of settlement increased as settlement proceeded in each of seven trials, up to the day of saturation. These results refute the commonly held assumptions that prospective territory owners avoid entering relatively full habitats, and that they prefer to settle in relatively unsaturated habitats. The discussion considers why assumptions about the behavioral processes of habitat selection are so widely accepted, given the dearth of empirical information on the subject.