Cause v. consequence-based regulation: Basel III v. the Eurocodes

被引:0
|
作者
Vermorken, Maximilian [1 ]
Vermorken, Alphons [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Environm & Geomat Engn, QASER Lab, London, England
[2] Solvay Brussels Sch Econ & Management, Business Engn, Brussels, Belgium
[3] PricewaterhouseCoopers, Brussels, Belgium
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
European legislation; Regulation; Europe; Banking; Civil engineering;
D O I
10.1108/13581981111123834
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to compare two opposite approaches chosen to regulate an industry. Design/methodology/approach - The approach is based on studying the two selected regulation systems, Basel III and the Eurocodes and identifies how the one system regulates financial institutions and the other one civil engineering design. Findings - The paper shows that the financial regulation uses a cause-based approach to regulation, in which the causes of a crisis are found and controlled. The Eurocodes in civil engineering make no specific attempt to understand the specific causes of a failure; however, they provide a framework, which transfers full responsibility onto the designer if the designer decides not to adhere to a set of codes of practice. It is the trade-off between less regulation and increased responsibility. Originality/value - The paper presents a new way of understanding the impact and use of regulation by comparing it to a system which has the same purpose but uses opposite
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 116
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条