Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis for Hyperopic Defects

被引:0
|
作者
Novoa Sanchez, Ester [1 ]
Perez Gomez, Dayami [1 ]
Mora Diaz, Isabel [1 ]
Mujica Villegas, Maydiris [1 ]
Alejandro Gelsi, Alberto [1 ]
Uria Gonzalez, Julio [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Quirurg Hermanos Ameijeiras, Havana, La Habana, Cuba
来源
关键词
keratomileusis; laser in situ; hyperopia; astigmatism; ophthalmologic surgical procedures; effectiveness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: currently, LASIK is one of the most common surgical procedures for refractive disorders, including hyperopic defects. Objective: to assess the results of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for the treatment of hyperopic defects. Methods: an ambispective study was conducted in 31 eyes (16 patients) operated on for hyperopia and simple and compound hyperopic astigmatism in the Refractive Surgery Unit of the Ophthalmology Department of the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital between January 2009 and December 2010. Visual acuity with and without optical correction, spherical and astigmatic component before and after surgery and intra-and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: patients aged 40 to 49 years predominated; compound hyperopic astigmatism was the most frequent defect; the mean uncorrected visual acuity improved and remained stable up to six months after surgery; the average values were 0.87 for moderate defects and 0.79 for high defects with optical correction. The mean sphero-cylindrical component decreased. The efficacy and safety rates were acceptable for moderate and high degrees of the defects and predictability was 100 % for all degrees of ametropia. Conclusion: LASIK is a safe, effective and predictable procedure to treat patients with moderate and high degrees hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 487
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Corneal iron ring after hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Özdamar, A
    Aras, C
    Sener, B
    Karaçorlu, M
    [J]. CORNEA, 1999, 18 (02) : 243 - 245
  • [2] Straylight before and after hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy
    Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth
    van der Linden, Jan Willem
    Optom, B.
    van der Meulen, Ivanka J. E.
    Nieuwendaal, Carla P.
    Mourits, Maarten P.
    van den Berg, Thomas J. T. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 36 (11): : 1919 - 1924
  • [3] Hyperopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for radial keratotomy-induced hyperopia
    Francesconi, CM
    Nosé, RAM
    Nosé, W
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) : 602 - 605
  • [4] Complications of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Sahay, Pranita
    Bafna, Rahul Kumar
    Reddy, Jagadesh C.
    Vajpayee, Rasik B.
    Sharma, Namrata
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 69 (07) : 1658 - 1669
  • [5] Femtosecond laser-assisted hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis with tissue-saving ablation: Analysis of 800 eyes
    Leccisotti, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 40 (07): : 1122 - 1130
  • [6] Surgical technique for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Duplessie, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY CLINICS, 1996, 36 (04) : 45 - 51
  • [7] Pterygium after hyperopic laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK)
    O'Brart, David P. S.
    Williams, Katherine
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2013, 96 (03) : 336 - 338
  • [8] Factors Predicting Loss of Best-Corrected Visual Acuity After Hyperopic Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis
    Mimouni, Michael
    Kaiserman, Igor
    Gutkovitch, Elena
    Ben-Shaul, Or
    Lavy, Itay
    Sela, Tzahi
    Munzer, Gur
    Sorkin, Nir
    [J]. CORNEA, 2024, 43 (05) : 598 - 602
  • [9] Femtosecond laser-assisted enhancements after laser in situ keratomileusis
    Guell, Jose L.
    Elies, Daniel
    Gris, Oscar
    Manero, Felicidad
    Morral, Merce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (11): : 1928 - 1931
  • [10] Thin-flap laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis
    Slade, Steven G.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2008, 19 (04) : 325 - 329