Relativistic mass of secondary neutrons in nuclear fission

被引:0
|
作者
Sharma, Ajay [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundamental Phys Soc, Post Box 107 GPO, Shimla 171001, Himachal Prades, India
关键词
Relativistic Mass; Neutron; Fission; Energy;
D O I
10.4006/0836-1398-28.2.157
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The relativistic variation of mass with speed is experimentally confirmed and widely used in physics. In fission reactions, neutrons have energy 0.025 eV or velocity 2185 m/s, whereas secondary neutrons have energy 2 MeV or 1.954 x 10(7) m/s: similar to 7% speed of light. The mass of neutrons having classical velocity is 1.0086649 u and that of a neutron moving with relativistic velocity is 1.01080879 u (thus the increase in mass of a neutron is 0.212547% as the difference in mass is 0.00213 u). In calculations of the Q-value for fission reactions, the masses of relativistic or nonrelativistic neutrons are considered to be the same, i.e., 1.0086649 u, which contradicts the relativistic variation of mass. Consequently, the Q-value turns out to be 173.271 MeV. If a body moves with relativistic speed then its relativistic energy (hence relativistic mass) is taken into account. If the mass of primary neutrons is considered to be 1.0086649 u and that of secondary neutrons 1.01080879 u (actual values), then the Q-value turns out to be 167.29 MeV. So there is a variation of energy: 5.99 MeV or 3.45%. This implies that the efficiency of reaction is less in this case as Q-values decrease. Therefore, in calculation of energy in reaction, the relativistic mass of a neutron must be taken into account, whence the lower efficiency of reaction/reactor is explained. It is an established experimental observation reported in the literature over the past four decades that energy emitted in fission of U 235 and Pu 236 is 20-60 MeV less than the energy predicted by Delta E = Delta mc(2). This can be explained if speeds of other products are precisely measured and relativistic masses are calculated. These aspects of basic nuclear physics are not yet acknowledged, as the Q-value turns out to be lower. (C) 2015 Physics Essays Publication.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 160
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nuclear-fission studies with relativistic secondary beams:: Analysis of fission channels
    Boeckstiegel, C.
    Steinhaeuser, S.
    Schmidt, K. -H.
    Clerc, H. -G.
    Grewe, A.
    Heinz, A.
    de Jong, M.
    Junghans, A. R.
    Mueller, J.
    Voss, B.
    NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2008, 802 : 12 - 25
  • [2] Fission of relativistic secondary beams
    Heinz, A
    Benlliure, J
    Bockstiegel, C
    Clerc, HG
    Grewe, A
    DeJong, M
    Junghans, AR
    Muller, J
    Pfutzner, M
    Schmidt, KH
    Steinhauser, S
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 1997, 28 (1-2): : 315 - 318
  • [3] NUCLEAR SHELLS AND PROMPT FISSION NEUTRONS
    BLINOV, MV
    EISMONT, VP
    SOVIET PHYSICS JETP-USSR, 1962, 15 (01): : 129 - 130
  • [4] Nuclear fission under the emission of neutrons
    Kirsch, G
    NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN, 1933, 21 : 332 - 332
  • [5] DERIVATION OF AVERAGE NUMBER OF SECONDARY NEUTRONS PER FISSION FROM MASS DISTRIBUTION OF PRODUCTS
    ZISIN, YA
    SELCHENK.LI
    LBOV, AA
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR ENERGY PARTS A AND B-REACTOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1963, 17 (01): : 41 - &
  • [6] Number of neutrons liberated in the nuclear fission of uranium
    von Halban, H
    Joliot, F
    Kowarski, L
    NATURE, 1939, 143 : 680 - 680
  • [7] Neck Rupture and Scission Neutrons in Nuclear Fission
    Abdurrahman, Ibrahim
    Kafker, Matthew
    Bulgac, Aurel
    Stetcu, Ionel
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2023, 132 (24)
  • [8] Energy of neutrons liberated in the nuclear fission of uranium induced by thermal neutrons
    von Halban, H
    Joliot, F
    Kowarski, L
    NATURE, 1939, 143 : 939 - 939
  • [9] MASS AND CHARGE BALANCE IN FISSION AND DELAYED NEUTRONS
    MAKSYUTENKO, BP
    SOVIET JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR PHYSICS-USSR, 1973, 17 (03): : 246 - 250
  • [10] Delayed neutrons as a probe of nuclear charge distribution in fission of heavy nuclei by neutrons
    Isaev, SG
    Piksaikin, VM
    Kazakov, LE
    Roshchenko, VA
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2002, 41 (1-4) : 117 - 124