Introduction: feminist judgments as teaching resources

被引:7
|
作者
Hunter, Rosemary [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Kent Law Sch, Law, Canterbury CT2 7NS, Kent, England
来源
LAW TEACHER | 2012年 / 46卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03069400.2012.732364
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While academic scholarship generally offers various forms of commentary on decided cases, feminist judgment-writing projects have recently embarked on a new form of critical scholarship. Rather than critiquing judgments from a feminist perspective in academic essays, the participants in these projects have set out instead to write alternative judgments, as if they had been one of the judges sitting in court at the time. After introducing the UK Feminist Judgments Project and describing what is "different" about the judgments it has produced, the paper explains some of the ways in which these judgments have been used as teaching resources in UK law schools. The paper goes on to introduce the following four articles in this issue of the Law Teacher, which illustrate in greater detail particular pedagogical uses of the Feminist Judgments Project.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 226
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条