EFFECTS OF INDOMETHACIN ON BIOLOGIC FIXATION OF POROUS-COATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS

被引:40
|
作者
COOK, SD
BARRACK, RL
DALTON, JE
THOMAS, KA
BROWN, TD
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 1995年 / 10卷 / 03期
关键词
PERIOPERATIVE; POROUS-COATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INDOMETHACIN; PUSH-OUT TESTING; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACE;
D O I
10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80184-6
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of perioperative administration of indomethacin on attachment strength and bone growth into porous-coated titanium implants was evaluated in the canine transcortical plug model. Various drug administration protocols simulating clinical use of indomethacin were studied. These included chronic treatment (starting 2 weeks prior to surgery), treatment immediately after surgery, and treatment 3, 6, 9, and 18 weeks following surgery. Indomethacin therapy was continued until sacrifice at 3, 6, 12, 18, or 24 postoperative weeks. Push-out testing was performed to determine the maximum bone-implant interface shear strength, and quantitative histologic analysis was used to determine percentage of bone ingrowth. When indomethacin was administered chronically or immediately after surgery, a statistically significant decrease in bone-implant interface attachment strength was seen at 3 postoperative weeks but not at later periods. No adverse effect was observed in any group after the 3-week period. Quantitative histologic analysis demonstrated no significant differences in percentage bone ingrowth among any of the treatment protocols at 3 or 6 weeks after surgery. No significant difference was observed between any of the groups at 18 or 24 weeks. The results of this study suggest that perioperative administration of indomethacin does not significantly affect attachment strength or bone ingrowth into porous-coated implants except at early periods, in which cases a transient decrease in attachment strength occurs.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 358
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF RADIATION ON FIXATION OF NONCEMENTED POROUS-COATED IMPLANTS IN A CANINE MODEL
    SUMNER, DR
    TURNER, TM
    PIERSON, RH
    KIENAPFEL, H
    URBAN, RM
    LIEBNER, EJ
    GALANTE, JO
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (10): : 1527 - 1533
  • [2] CURRENT CONCEPTS REVIEW - BIOLOGICAL FIXATION OF POROUS-COATED IMPLANTS
    HADDAD, RJ
    COOK, SD
    THOMAS, KA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (09): : 1459 - 1466
  • [3] The effect of bone compaction on early fixation of porous-coated implants
    Green, JR
    Nemzek, JA
    Arnoczky, SP
    Johnson, LL
    Balas, MS
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (01): : 91 - 97
  • [4] Porous-coated fixation: The experience
    Mallory, TH
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1996, 19 (09) : 736 - 738
  • [5] Demineralized bone matrix and human cancellous bone enhance fixation of porous-coated titanium implants in sheep
    Babiker, Hassan
    Ding, Ming
    Overgaard, Soren
    JOURNAL OF TISSUE ENGINEERING AND REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 10 (03) : 245 - 251
  • [6] The odyssey of porous-coated fixation
    Engh, CA
    Hopper, RH
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2002, 17 (04): : 102 - 107
  • [7] POROUS-COATED FIXATION FOREVER
    ENGH, CA
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1994, 17 (09) : 775 - 776
  • [8] POROUS-COATED FIXATION - A RITE OF PASSAGE
    ENGH, CA
    ORTHOPEDICS, 1995, 18 (09) : 804 - 807
  • [9] Porous-coated femoral fixation: The long and short of it
    McAuley, JP
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 23 (09) : 917 - 918
  • [10] CIPROFLOXACIN ATTACHMENT TO POROUS-COATED TITANIUM SURFACES
    DUNN, DS
    RAGHAVAN, S
    VOLZ, RG
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 1994, 5 (04) : 325 - 331