Comparison of techniques for quantification of next-generation sequencing libraries

被引:10
|
作者
Hussing, C. [1 ]
Kampmann, M. L. [1 ]
Mogensen, H. S. [1 ]
Borsting, C. [1 ]
Morling, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Forens Med, Sect Forens Genet, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
DNA quantification; Next-generation sequencing libraries; NanoDrop; Qubit; (R); Fragment Analyzer (TM); GX Touch; Bioanalyzer; TapeStation;
D O I
10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.110
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
To ensure efficient sequencing, the DNA of next-generation sequencing (NGS) libraries must be quantified correctly. Therefore, an accurate, sensitive and stable method for DNA quantification is crucial. In this study, seven different methods for DNA quantification were compared to each other by quantifying NGS libraries for the Ion Torrent (TM) and Illumina (R) platforms as well as dsDNA oligos with known DNA concentrations. Rather large variations in library concentration estimates were observed. The differences between the highest and lowest concentration estimates varied with a factor of 5-100 depending on the library concentration. The Bioanalyzer, TapeStation and Qubit1 instruments gave concentrations closest to the expected when quantifying dsDNA oligos. At very low concentrations (2-4 pg/ul) only the Bioanalyzer could reliably quantify the dsDNA oligos. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E276 / E278
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rapid quantification of DNA libraries for next-generation sequencing
    Buehler, Bernd
    Hogrefe, Holly H.
    Scott, Graham
    Ravi, Harini
    Pabon-Pena, Carlos
    O'Brien, Scott
    Formosa, Rachel
    Happe, Scott
    [J]. METHODS, 2010, 50 (04) : S15 - S18
  • [2] Next-generation DNA sequencing techniques
    Ansorge, Wilhelm J.
    [J]. NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 25 (04) : 195 - 203
  • [3] Comparison of the optimal and suboptimal quantity of mitotype libraries using next-generation sequencing
    Marcel Obal
    Tomaž Zupanc
    Irena Zupanič Pajnič
    [J]. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 2024, 138 : 395 - 400
  • [4] Comparison of the optimal and suboptimal quantity of mitotype libraries using next-generation sequencing
    Obal, Marcel
    Zupanc, Tomaz
    Pajnic, Irena Zupanic
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2024, 138 (02) : 395 - 400
  • [5] Next-generation sequencing: a short comparison
    Stangier, Kerstin A.
    [J]. LABORATORIUMSMEDIZIN-JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 33 (05): : 267 - 270
  • [6] Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Systems
    Liu, Lin
    Li, Yinhu
    Li, Siliang
    Hu, Ni
    He, Yimin
    Pong, Ray
    Lin, Danni
    Lu, Lihua
    Law, Maggie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012,
  • [7] Fast and Easy DNA Quantification for Next-Generation Sequencing
    [J]. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology News, 2021, 41 (10): : 53
  • [8] Statistical Quantification of Methylation Levels by Next-Generation Sequencing
    Wu, Guodong
    Yi, Nengjun
    Absher, Devin
    Zhi, Degui
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):
  • [9] Bringing Next-Generation Sequencing into the Classroom through a Comparison of Molecular Biology Techniques
    Bowling, Bethany
    Zimmer, Erin
    Pyatt, Robert E.
    [J]. AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2014, 76 (06): : 396 - 401
  • [10] Next-generation sequencing of the next generation
    Darren J. Burgess
    [J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2011, 12 : 78 - 79