ANTENATAL CARE OF LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC PATIENTS BY MIDWIVES - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

被引:29
|
作者
GILES, W [1 ]
COLLINS, J [1 ]
ONG, F [1 ]
MACDONALD, R [1 ]
机构
[1] WESTMEAD HOSP,DEPT OBSTET & GYNAECOL,WESTMEAD,NSW 2145,AUSTRALIA
关键词
D O I
10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb137076.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the practicality, acceptability to patients and salary costs of the antenatal care of low risk obstetric patients by midwives. Design: A randomised controlled trial. Setting: The antenatal clinic at Westmead Hospital, a teaching hospital of the University of Sydney in western Sydney. Patients: From January 1989 until November 1990, 89 women booking for full antenatal care at Westmead Hospital and classified as low risk were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group 1 (43 patients) had their antenatal care provided by registered midwives. Group 2 (46 patients) had their antenatal care provided by an obstetrician (either Visiting Medical Officer or Staff Specialist) in a routine hospital antenatal clinic. Interventions: Patients in the midwives' clinic were seen by an obstetrician at their first visit to the antenatal clinic and again at 30 weeks and at 40 weeks. Main outcome measures: These were the salary costs of each clinic and the patients' levels of satisfaction. Maternal and neonatal indicators, delivery details and analgesic requirements were also considered. These indicators were planned before data collection commenced. Results: The major differences found were a 28% to 68% salary cost saving and that patients cared for by midwives showed appreciation of the continuity of care and information given at the midwives' clinic. Conclusions: The care of low risk obstetric patients by midwives in a midwives' clinic showed salary cost savings and high patient acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 161
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ANTENATAL CARE OF LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC PATIENTS BY MIDWIVES
    GUDGEON, CW
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1992, 157 (08) : 575 - 575
  • [2] Care management for low-risk patients with heart failure - A randomized, controlled trial
    DeBusk, RF
    Miller, NH
    Parker, KM
    Bandura, A
    Kraemer, HC
    Cher, DJ
    West, JA
    Fowler, MB
    Greenwald, G
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (08) : 606 - 613
  • [3] Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women
    Bernitz, Stine
    Oian, Pal
    Sandvik, Leiv
    Blix, Ellen
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [4] Evaluation of satisfaction with care in a midwifery unit and an obstetric unit: a randomized controlled trial of low-risk women
    Stine Bernitz
    Pål Øian
    Leiv Sandvik
    Ellen Blix
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16
  • [5] LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC CARE FOR LOW-RISK MOTHERS
    GOODLIN, RC
    [J]. LANCET, 1980, 1 (8176): : 1017 - 1019
  • [6] Neuroticism is associated with higher antenatal care utilization in obstetric low-risk women
    Axfors, Cathrine
    Hellgren, Charlotte
    Volgsten, Helena
    Svanberg, Agneta Skoog
    Ekselius, Lisa
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Ramklint, Mia
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    Sundstrom-Poromaa, Inger
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (04) : 470 - 478
  • [7] LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC PATIENTS
    MULLINS, PR
    PATTISON, NS
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 102 (880) : 621 - 621
  • [8] To see or not to see? Midwives' perceptions of reduced antenatal attendances for 'low-risk' women
    Sanders, J
    Somerset, M
    Jewell, D
    Sharp, D
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 1999, 15 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [9] RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMEN
    TABOR, A
    MADSEN, M
    OBEL, EB
    PHILIP, J
    BANG, J
    NORGAARDPEDERSEN, B
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8493): : 1287 - 1293
  • [10] A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF FETAL HEART-RATE MONITORING IN A LOW-RISK OBSTETRIC POPULATION
    WOOD, C
    RENOU, P
    OATS, J
    FARRELL, E
    BEISCHER, N
    ANDERSON, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1981, 141 (05) : 527 - 534