Assessment of Oncology Medical Records as per NABH Standards

被引:1
|
作者
Sinha, Rajesh Kumar [1 ]
Shenoy, Nandana [1 ]
机构
[1] Manipal Univ, Manipal Coll Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Informat Management, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
关键词
Medical documentation; medical records; Information Management System; Patient Rights and Education; compliance;
D O I
10.1177/0972063413492035
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: A complete, accurate, adequate and timely medical documentation helps in reducing medical errors and serves as important medical-legal evidence. Objective: To evaluate Oncology Medical Records based on the National Accreditation Board of Hospitals Information Management System (NABH.IMS) and Patient Rights and Education (NABH.PRE) standards. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted to assess the policies and procedures in relation to medical documentation against NABH.IMS 1-7 standards and NABH. PRE-3 Standards. A total of 520 discharged inpatient records were analyzed to understand the quality of medical documentation in practice. Results: The existing policies and procedures were found to be compliant with NABH. IMS and NABH. PRE standards. The analysis of medical records showed maximum compliance in Nurse's records, Doctor's order forms, Anaesthesia reports of Breast and Head & Neck Cancer and Radiotherapy Charts in Cervical Cancer. Conclusion: Overall documentation was found to be satisfactory as per the standards set by NABH. The study results revealed that the attention to compulsorily document patient clinical data in the respective forms of the medical records will enhance the completeness and accuracy of medical documentation of the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 343
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SEMANTIC STANDARDS FOR THE REPRESENTATION OF MEDICAL RECORDS
    MORI, AR
    GALEAZZI, E
    GANGEMI, A
    PISANELLI, DM
    THORNTON, AM
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1991, 11 (04) : S76 - S80
  • [2] Medical records and record-keeping standards
    Carpenter, Iain
    Ram, Mala Bridgelal
    Croft, Giles P.
    Williams, John G.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2007, 7 (04) : 328 - 331
  • [4] Usability Considerations in Oncology Electronic Medical Records
    Hassett, Michael J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2017, 13 (08) : 539 - +
  • [5] Oncology Medical Home: ASCO and COA Standards
    Woofter, Kim
    Kennedy, Erin B.
    Adelson, Kerin
    Bowman, Ronda
    Brodie, Rachel
    Dickson, Natalie
    Gerber, Rose
    Fields, Karen K.
    Murtaugh, Carol
    Polite, Blase
    Paschall, Marcus
    Skelton, Matthew
    Zoet, Dennis
    Cox, John, V
    [J]. JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 17 (08) : 475 - +
  • [6] Update to new oncology medical home standards
    Hudson, Melissa M.
    [J]. CANCER, 2022, 128 (01) : 12 - 13
  • [7] Assessment of computerized medical records
    PastorSanchez, R
    LopezMiras, A
    Gervas, J
    [J]. MEDICINA CLINICA, 1996, 107 (07): : 250 - 254
  • [8] Sports Medical Assessment in Oncology
    Banzer, W.
    Vogt, L.
    Huebscher, M.
    Thiel, C.
    [J]. DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SPORTMEDIZIN, 2012, 63 (01): : 20 - 22
  • [9] RAPID: An electronic medical records system for radiation oncology
    Sailer, SL
    Tepper, JE
    MArgoleseMalin, L
    Rosenman, JG
    Chaney, EL
    [J]. SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 1997, 7 (01) : 4 - 10
  • [10] Electronic Medical Records: Oncology Practices Take the Plunge
    Hede, Karyn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (14) : 976 - U13