Ending Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Risk Women After Age 65: Understanding Barriers to Adherence With Evidence-Based Guidelines Among Primary Care Providers

被引:7
|
作者
Boone, Emily [1 ]
Karp, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Lewis, LaVonna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Sol Price Sch Publ Policy, 650 Childs Way RGL 309, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Med Clin, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
cervical cancer screening guidelines; evidence-based medicine; overscreening; health services utilization; women over age 65; adherence to screening guidelines;
D O I
10.1177/2333392818755241
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current evidence-based cervical cancer testing guidelines recommend that screening of low-risk women ceases after age 65. Despite this, research suggests that continued testing by primary care providers remains common and represents unnecessary patient discomfort, cost, and consumption of valuable primary care resources. Objective: To understand why primary care providers might knowingly ignore consensus evidence-based screening guidelines for cervical cancer in low-risk women of this age-group and to identify barriers to adherence with best practice recommendations. Methods: A survey tool to identify barriers to adherence with current guidelines for cervical cancer screening in low-risk women older than age 65 was mailed to 4929 randomly selected primary care providers throughout California. Providers were asked to indicate the predominant reason(s) they might knowingly continue cervical cancer screening in women older than 65 years, despite evidence-based recommendations to the contrary. Results: Qualified surveys were received from 1259 (25.5%) of those surveyed, representing primary care providers of all types, practicing in areas of vastly different demographics. Despite published reassurance to the contrary, many providers retain fear that discontinuation of testing in low-risk women after age 65 may result in missed invasive cervical cancer. Even among health-care providers who agree that cessation of screening is safe, other circumstances prompt their recommendation to continue cervical screening. Conclusion: Although the data from this study suggest areas of policy intervention to lessen unnecessary cervical cancer screening, the broader implication is that advancement of evidence-based medicine will be of little value in improving the quality and cost of health care if barriers to guideline adherence are poorly understood and addressed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Providers' Adherence to Evidence-Based Asthma Guidelines in Pediatric Primary Care
    Pudasainee-Kapri, Sangita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NURSING-NURSING CARE OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES, 2021, 57 : 18 - 24
  • [2] Evidence-based recommendations on care for breast cancer survivors for primary care providers: a review of evidence-based breast cancer guidelines
    Spronk, Inge
    Korevaar, Joke C.
    Schellevis, Francois G.
    Albreht, Tit
    Burgers, Jako S.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [3] Non adherence to cancer screening guidelines for cervical cancer among women who attended prenatal care
    Ribeiro, Luciane
    Bastos, Ronaldo Rocha
    Ribeiro, Luiz Claudio
    Vieira, Marcel de Toledo
    Goncalves Leite, Isabel Cristina
    Bustamante Teixeira, Maria Teresa
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2013, 35 (07): : 323 - 330
  • [4] Differences Among Primary Care Physicians' Adherence to 2009 ACOG Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening
    Corbelli, Jennifer
    Borrero, Sonya
    Bonnema, Rachel
    McNamara, Megan
    Kraemer, Kevin
    Rubio, Doris
    Karpov, Irina
    McNeil, Melissa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 23 (05) : 397 - 403
  • [5] Evidence-Based Intervention to Reduce Access Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Underserved Chinese American Women
    Wang, Xingjie
    Fang, Carolyn
    Tan, Yin
    Liu, Andy
    Ma, Grace X.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2010, 19 (03) : 463 - 469
  • [6] Screening for Cervical Cancer Among Low-Risk Populations: Orthodox Jewish Women as a Model
    Caspi, Revital
    Schejter, Eduardo
    Groutz, Asnat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 25 (07) : 747 - 751
  • [7] Evidence-based practice and its application to childbirth care for low-risk women
    Rooks, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1999, 44 (04): : 355 - 369
  • [8] Adherence to the 2012 National Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines in Women 30-65 Years of Age: A Retrospective Review
    Teoh, Deanna
    Hultman, Gretchen
    Geller, Melissa
    Harwood, Eileen
    Le, Chap
    Vogel, Rachel Isaksson
    Melton-Meaux, Genevieve
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 27 (11) : 1430 - 1431
  • [9] Understanding Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening in Women With Access to Care, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2014
    Crawford, Anatasha
    Benard, Vicki
    King, Jessica
    Thomas, Cheryll C.
    [J]. PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE, 2016, 13 : 1 - 8
  • [10] Evidence-Based Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines for Women Who Received Chest Irradiation at a Young Age
    Yahalom, Joachim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (18) : 2240 - 2242