SYRINGE AND NEEDLE EXCHANGE PROGRAMS WORLDWIDE .2.

被引:5
|
作者
SCHWARTZ, RH
机构
[1] GEORGETOWN UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PEDIAT,WASHINGTON,DC 20057
[2] GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIV,SCH MED,WASHINGTON,DC 20052
[3] FAIRFAX HOSP,FALLS CHURCH,VA 22046
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007611-199303000-00015
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The first large-scale syringe and needle exchange (SANE) programs were established in The Netherlands and in the United Kingdom (UK) about 8 years ago. Since then, SANE programs have been established in Australia, Sweden, Canada, and the United States. To date, the most useful data concerning the impact of these programs have come from studies in the UK and from New Haven, San Francisco, Tacoma, and New York City in the US. Successful SANE programs require careful planning; those in charge should be familiar with the accomplishments, problems, and goals of established programs. Advance publicity and involvement of community activists, the local police precinct, and ward or district politicians are imperative for overcoming misunderstandings and prejudices and fostering a team approach. Pilot projects must be adequately funded. Other requirements include accessible facilities, convenient hours of operation (including evening hours), provision of mobile units if at all possible, and provision for sanitary disposal of discarded injection equipment in the neighborhood around the SANE programs. Programs also should have a strong evaluation component, preferably staffed by an independent university-affiliated research center. Periodic site visits are necessary to ensure that services promised in the protocol are actually delivered not only initially, but also over time. Problems with security and drug dealing in and around the building where the SANE program is located are likely, and appropriate measures should be taken to counter them.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 327
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Needle and syringe exchange programs in Amsterdam
    Witteveen, E
    Schippers, G
    [J]. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2006, 41 (6-7) : 835 - 836
  • [2] SYRINGE AND NEEDLE EXCHANGE PROGRAMS .1.
    SCHWARTZ, RH
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1993, 86 (03) : 318 - 322
  • [3] Research note: Drug consumption rooms and needle and syringe exchange programs
    Patel, Kiran
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DRUG ISSUES, 2007, 37 (03) : 737 - 747
  • [4] NEEDLE AND SYRINGE EXCHANGE PROGRAMS IN CORRECTIONAL SETTINGS: FEASIBLE, SAFE AND NECESSARY!
    Wolff, Hans
    Favrod-Coune, Thierry
    Rieder, Jean-Pierre
    Pinault, Francoise
    Getaz, Laurent
    Broers, Barbara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 26 : S141 - S142
  • [5] OPPOSITION TO NEEDLE AND SYRINGE PROGRAMS IN NSW
    White, Bethany
    Haber, Paul
    Day, Carolyn A.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2013, 32 : 72 - 73
  • [6] Supporting needle and syringe programs in Australia
    Rouen, D
    Dolan, K
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 25 (02) : 187 - 187
  • [7] Assessing syringe exchange programs
    Des Jarlais, DC
    Braine, N
    [J]. ADDICTION, 2004, 99 (09) : 1081 - 1082
  • [8] EFFECTS OF AMSTERDAM NEEDLE AND SYRINGE EXCHANGE
    BUNING, EC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1991, 26 (12): : 1303 - 1311
  • [9] Secondary syringe exchange among users of 23 California syringe exchange programs
    Lorvick, Jennifer
    Bluthenthal, Ricky N.
    Scott, Andrea
    Gilbert, Mary Lou
    Riehman, Kara S.
    Anderson, Rachel L.
    Flynn, Neil M.
    Kral, Alex H.
    [J]. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2006, 41 (6-7) : 865 - 882
  • [10] Thinking ethically about needle and syringe programs
    Kleinig, John
    [J]. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2006, 41 (6-7) : 815 - 825