Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia

被引:3
|
作者
Clark, David Glenn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL USA
[2] Birmingham VA Med Ctr, Birmingham, SC 35293 USA
来源
LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS COMPASS | 2011年 / 5卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1749-818x.2011.00309.x
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Aphasia is a disorder of language that sometimes occurs in the setting of brain damage. Aphasic disturbances of syntactic comprehension have been described only in recent decades, and have been characterized as the loss of the ability to understand non-canonical sentences. Several interesting hypotheses have been advanced to explain this phenomenon. Some of these hypotheses rest on the assumption that heuristics play a role in producing the aphasic comprehension pattern. Evidence from the past decade suggests that heuristic processes do play a role in normal sentence comprehension, and act in concert with slower processes that more closely resemble the syntax of linguistic theory. The slower syntactic mechanisms appear to be more readily disturbed by brain damage, leading to greater difficulty with sentences that cannot be interpreted heuristically. However, the dichotomy between canonical and non-canonical sentences accounts for little of the variance in the performance of aphasic individuals. Instead, the comprehension of each sentence structure is disrupted according to the complexity of the structure and the severity of the individual's aphasia. This observation argues against hypotheses that posit a deficit of a specific linguistic operation and favors reduction of a hypothetical cognitive resource that is necessary for normal comprehension. In this case, the chief contribution from linguistic theory is the syntactic tree itself, which affords a concise characterization of the difficulty of parsing and interpreting a given sentence. The field now faces several challenges. The neural basis of heuristic, parsing, and interpretive mechanisms must be elucidated. Achievement of this objective entails a neural characterization of the cognitive resource that is disrupted in sentence comprehension disorders and of the semantic representations onto which morphemes and sentences are mapped.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 730
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sentence comprehension and task effects in aphasia
    Salis, Christos
    Edwards, Susan
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2006, 99 (1-2) : 116 - 117
  • [2] Modelling the Breakdown of Sentence Comprehension in Aphasia
    Vasishth, Shravan
    Hanne, Sandra
    Burchert, Frank
    De Bleser, Ria
    [J]. AOA2010, 48TH ACADEMY OF APHASIA PROCEEDINGS, 2010, 6 : 166 - 167
  • [3] Variability in sentence comprehension in aphasia in German
    Pregla, Dorothea
    Lisson, Paula
    Vasishth, Shravan
    Burchert, Frank
    Stadie, Nicole
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2021, 222
  • [4] SYNTACTIC DETERMINANTS OF SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA
    CAPLAN, D
    BAKER, C
    DEHAUT, F
    [J]. COGNITION, 1985, 21 (02) : 117 - 175
  • [5] The effect of a sentence comprehension treatment on discourse comprehension in aphasia
    Kiran, Swathi
    Des Roches, Carrie
    Villard, Sarah
    Tripodis, Yorghos
    [J]. APHASIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (11) : 1289 - 1311
  • [6] VERB PROCESSING DURING SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA
    SHAPIRO, LP
    LEVINE, BA
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 38 (01) : 21 - 47
  • [7] Tracking passive sentence comprehension in agrammatic aphasia
    Meyer, Aaron M.
    Mack, Jennifer E.
    Thompson, Cynthia K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLINGUISTICS, 2012, 25 (01) : 31 - 43
  • [8] GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS AND SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN AGRAMMATIC APHASIA
    WULFECK, BB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1988, 31 (01): : 72 - 81
  • [9] EFFECT OF SYNTACTIC ENCODING ON SENTENCE COMPREHENSION IN APHASIA
    GOODGLASS, H
    BLUMSTEIN, SE
    GLEASON, JB
    HYDE, MR
    GREEN, E
    STATLENDER, S
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1979, 7 (02) : 201 - 209
  • [10] COMPREHENSION OF SENTENCE STRUCTURE IN ANOMIC AND CONDUCTION APHASIA
    PEACH, RK
    CANTER, GJ
    GALLAHER, AJ
    [J]. BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1988, 35 (01) : 119 - 137