Stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for brain metastases in the United States: a national survey

被引:15
|
作者
Blomain, Erik Scott [1 ]
Kim, Hyun [2 ]
Garg, Shivank [2 ]
Bhamidipati, Deepak [1 ]
Guo, Jenny [1 ]
Kalchman, Ingrid [1 ]
McAna, John [3 ]
Shi, Wenyin [2 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Dept Radiat Oncol, 111 South 11th St, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[3] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Coll Populat Hlth, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
SRS; Stereotactic radiosurgery; Brain metastases; Practice patterns;
D O I
10.1007/s13566-018-0353-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an important modality for the treatment of intracranial metastases. There are currently few established guidelines delineating indications for SRS use and fewer still regarding plan evaluation in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. Methods An 18 question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated cancer centers in the USA (60). Centers without radiation oncologists were excluded. Physicians who indicated that they do not prescribe SRS were excluded from the remaining survey questions. Sign test and Chi-square test were used to determine if responses differed significantly from random distribution. Results One hundred sixteen of the 697 radiation oncologists surveyed completed the questionnaire, representing 51 institutions. Sixty-two percent reported treating patients with brain metastases using SRS. Radiation oncologists prescribing SRS most commonly treat CNS (66.2%) and lung (49.3%) malignancies. SRS was used more frequently for < 10 brain metastases (73.7%; p < 0.0001) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for > 10 brain metastases (82.5%; p < 0.0001). The maximum number of lesions physicians were willing to treat with SRS without WBRT was 1-4 (40.4%) and 5-10 (42.4%) (p < 0.0001 compared to 11-15, 16-20 and no limit). The most important criteria for choosing SRS or WBRT were number of lesions (p < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.016). The most common margin for SRS was 0 mm (49.1%; p = 0.0021). The most common dose constraints other than critical structure was conformity index (84.2%) and brain V12 (61.4%). The LINAC was the most common treatment modality (54.4%) and mono-isocenter technique for multiple brain metastases was commonly used (43.9%; p = 0.23). Most departments do not have a policy for brain metastases treatment (64.9%; p = 0.024). Conclusions This is one of the first national surveys assessing the use of SRS for brain metastases in clinical practice. These data highlight some clinical considerations for physicians treating brain metastases with SRS.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 246
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation Therapy Practice Patterns for Brain Metastases in the United States in the Stereotactic Radiosurgery Era
    Barbour, Andrew B.
    Jacobs, Corbin D.
    Williamson, Hannah
    Floyd, Scott R.
    Suneja, Gita
    Torok, Jordan A.
    Kirkpatrick, John P.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 5 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [2] Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Practice Patterns and Disparities in the United States
    Kann, B. H.
    Park, H. S. M.
    Chiang, V. L.
    Yu, J. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E83 - E84
  • [3] Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: Changing Practice Patterns and Disparities in the United States
    Kann, Benjamin H.
    Park, Henry S.
    Johnson, Skyler B.
    Chiang, Veronica L.
    Yu, James B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2017, 15 (12): : 1494 - 1502
  • [4] Stereotactic Radiosurgery After Resection of Brain Metastases: Changing Patterns of Care in the United States
    Chin, Alexander L.
    Li, Gordon
    Gephart, Melanie Hayden
    Sandhu, Navjot
    Nagpal, Seema
    Soltys, Scott G.
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 144 : E797 - E806
  • [5] DEFINING STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY USE PRACTICES FOR BRAIN METASTASES IN THE UNITED STATES
    Kim, Hyun
    Garg, Shivank
    Guo, Jenny
    Kalchman, Ingrid
    McAna, John
    Shi, Wenyin
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 30 - 30
  • [6] Shifts in Stereotactic Radiosurgery Platform Utilization for Brain Metastases in the United States
    Park, H. S. M.
    Wang, E. H.
    Rutter, C. E.
    Corso, C. D.
    Chiang, V. L.
    Yu, J. B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E62 - E62
  • [7] Disparities in stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for treatment of brain metastases: A large national cancer database study
    Taparra, Kekoa A.
    Shih, Jonathan
    Patel, Manali I.
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (16)
  • [8] Evolving National Practice Patterns of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy Versus Single-Fraction Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases
    Jairam, V.
    Kann, B. H.
    Patel, K.
    Yu, J. B.
    Hansen, J. E.
    Husain, Z. A.
    Bindra, R. S.
    Contessa, J. N.
    Omay, S. B.
    Chiang, V. L.
    Park, H. S. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E227 - E227
  • [9] Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases
    Obedian, E
    deLotbiniere, A
    Haffty, B
    Piepmeier, J
    Fischer, D
    Knisely, J
    [J]. RADIOSURGERY 1997, 1998, 2 : 78 - 85
  • [10] Stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases
    Chorváth, M
    Durkovsky, A
    Rattaj, M
    Sramka, M
    Steno, J
    Boljesíková, E
    [J]. 12TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF NEUROSURGERY (EANS), PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 727 - 732