Educational choice and risk preferences: How important is relative vs. individual risk preference?

被引:0
|
作者
Obermeier, Vanessa [2 ]
Schneider, Thorsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Inst Sociol, Beethovenstr 15, D-04107 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Leibniz Inst Educ Trajectories, D-96047 Bamberg, Germany
来源
关键词
Educational inequality; Educational decision-making; Risk preference; Relative risk aversion; Tertiary education; Vocational training;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The primary goal of this article is to examine the influence of relative vs. individual risk preference in educational choice. To do so, we discuss relative risk preference in prospect theory and in sociological models of educational choice and debate the notable but widely neglected importance of individual risk preferences for educational plans and decisions. We analyze these different forms of risk preference and demonstrate how they influence the intentions for further education of students attending Gymnasium, the academically oriented secondary school track in Germany. Using data collected from the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) youth questionnaire in the years 2003 to 2012, we find not only that students from a higher socio-economic background are less sensitive to their school performance but also that their individual risk preferences are completely irrelevant to their educational plans. The opposite applies to students from a lower socio-economic background: the more risk-averse they are, the less likely they are to opt for a university degree. Most importantly, we find support for the notion of relative risk-seeking in upper social classes and relative risk aversion in lower classes.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 128
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences
    Mohammed Abdellaoui
    Olivier l’Haridon
    Corina Paraschiv
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2013, 75 : 175 - 191
  • [2] Individual vs. couple behavior: an experimental investigation of risk preferences
    Abdellaoui, Mohammed
    l'Haridon, Olivier
    Paraschiv, Corina
    [J]. THEORY AND DECISION, 2013, 75 (02) : 175 - 191
  • [3] Absolute risk vs. relative risk
    Wilets, I
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2001, 101 (04) : 30 - 30
  • [4] RISK CHOICE: INTENTION VS. ACTION
    Kornienko, Dmitry S.
    Baleva, Milena V.
    Yachmeneva, Nadezhda P.
    [J]. EKSPERIMENTALNAYA PSIKHOLOGIYA, 2023, 16 (01): : 87 - 100
  • [5] The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice
    Richard Davies
    Eskil Heinesen
    Anders Holm
    [J]. Journal of Population Economics, 2002, 15 : 683 - 713
  • [6] The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice
    Davies, R
    Heinesen, E
    Holm, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2002, 15 (04) : 683 - 713
  • [7] Stated and revealed heterogeneous risk preferences in educational choice
    Fossen, Frank M.
    Glocker, Daniela
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 97 : 1 - 25
  • [8] INDIVIDUAL VS. NETWORK PREFERENCES
    Zhang, June
    Moura, Jose M. F.
    [J]. 2015 49TH ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON SIGNALS, SYSTEMS AND COMPUTERS, 2015, : 1535 - 1538
  • [9] Choice Under Risk: How Occupation Influences Preferences
    Hill, Tetiana
    Kusev, Petko
    van Schaik, Paul
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [10] Individual vs. group decision-making: an experiment on dynamic choice under risk and ambiguity
    Enrica Carbone
    Konstantinos Georgalos
    Gerardo Infante
    [J]. Theory and Decision, 2019, 87 : 87 - 122