Mandatory sentencing? Use [with] discretion

被引:2
|
作者
Warner, Kate [1 ]
Spiranovic, Caroline [1 ]
Freiberg, Arie [2 ]
Davis, Julia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Fac Law, Private Bag 89 GPO, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Law, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Sch Law, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Public opinion; mandatory sentences; sentencing discretion;
D O I
10.1177/1037969X18793967
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
When asked about sentencing discretion and mandatory sentences, jurors participating in the Victorian Jury Sentencing Study expressed strong support for sentencing discretion and weak support for mandatory sentences despite a belief by jurors that, in general, sentences are too lenient. This strengthens the argument that polls that pose a general question about mandatory sentences or sentencing severity divorced from the context of a specific case are an inadequate and misleading measure of public opinion.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条