MAXIMIZING CONJUNCTIVE USE OF SURFACE AND GROUND-WATER UNDER SURFACE-WATER QUALITY CONSTRAINTS

被引:33
|
作者
EJAZ, MS
PERALTA, RC
机构
[1] Agricultural Engineering and Water Management, Agriculture Department, Government of Sindh, Karachi
[2] Biological and Irrigation Engineering Department, Utah State University, Logan
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0309-1708(95)00004-3
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
A simulation/optimization (s/o) model is presented to address the increasingly common conflicts between water quantity and quality objectives. The model can assist water resources analysts in selecting compromise strategies for stream/aquifer systems in which the stream gains water from the aquifer. The water quantity objective is to maximize steady conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water resources. The water quality objective is to maximize waste loading from a sewage treatment plant (STP) to the stream without violating downstream water quality beyond acceptable limits. The STP discharge is proportional to human population. The two objectives conflict because an increase in groundwater extraction reduces dilution of the stream water contaminants. The result is a decrease in the STP waste loading to the stream and the waste-producing human population that can be supported. The trade-off between objectives is illustrated graphically via sets of noninferior solutions. The sets of noninferior solutions are prepared using the E-constraint method and assuming different upstream flow rates. The s/o model includes superposition expressions describing head and flow responses to decision variables (pumping, diversion, and loadings) and regression expressions describing contaminant concentration responses to these decision variables. Modeled contaminants include: 5-day biochemical oxygen demand, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen (organic, ammonia, nitrite, and nitrate), organic and dissolved phosphorus, total dissolved solids, and chlorophyll-a.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 75
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CONJUNCTIVE USE OF GROUND AND SURFACE-WATER
    MAKNOON, R
    BURGES, SJ
    JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 1978, 70 (08): : 419 - 424
  • [2] Transport and fate of nitrate at the ground-water/surface-water interface
    Puckett, Larry J.
    Zamora, Celia
    Essaid, Hedeff
    Wilson, John T.
    Johnson, Henry M.
    Brayton, Michael J.
    Vogel, Jason R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2008, 37 (03) : 1034 - 1050
  • [3] Temporal responses of surface-water and ground-water to precipitation in Illinois
    Wendland, WM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2001, 37 (03): : 685 - 693
  • [4] SIMULATION OF INTEGRATED SURFACE-WATER AND GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS - MODEL FORMULATION
    YAN, JS
    SMITH, KR
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1994, 30 (05): : 879 - 890
  • [5] Analyzing ground-water gley and surface-water (pseudogley) effects in paleosols
    PiPujol, MD
    Buurman, P
    QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 51-2 : 77 - 79
  • [6] FARM INCOME AND GROUND-WATER QUALITY IMPLICATIONS FROM REDUCING SURFACE-WATER SEDIMENT DELIVERIES
    PIPER, S
    HUANG, WY
    RIBAUDO, M
    WATER RESOURCES BULLETIN, 1989, 25 (06): : 1217 - 1230
  • [7] Evaluation of ground-water and surface-water exchanges using streamflow difference analyses
    Opsahl, Stephen P.
    Chapal, Scott E.
    Hicks, David W.
    Wheeler, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (05): : 1132 - 1141
  • [8] SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS FOR RN-222 DISSOLVED IN GROUND-WATER AND SURFACE-WATER
    CECIL, LD
    GESELL, TF
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1992, 20 (01) : 55 - 66
  • [9] PESTICIDES IN GROUND-WATER, SURFACE-WATER AND SPRING RUNOFF IN A SMALL SASKATCHEWAN WATERSHED
    WAITE, DT
    GROVER, R
    WESTCOTT, ND
    SOMMERSTAD, H
    KERR, L
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1992, 11 (06) : 741 - 748
  • [10] AN INTEGRATED MODEL OF SURFACE AND GROUND-WATER QUALITY
    BRAZEE, RJ
    CRUTCHFIELD, SR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 72 (05) : 1363 - 1363