GREENFIELD DECOMMISSIONING AT SHIPPINGPORT: COSTIVIANAGEMENT AND EXPERIENCE

被引:0
|
作者
Murphie, William [1 ]
机构
[1] US DOE, Div Facil & Site Decommissioning Projects, Eastern Decommissioning Programs, Off Environm Restorat, Washington, DC 20585 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although there are many indications that nuclear power plants are likely to stay on site for a period of 60 to 100 years after closure, there are also several reasons to remove the facility from the landscape, such as the desire to use the site for a new power plant or other purpose, safety, and aesthetics. Such removal is underway in several countries including Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany. In this chapter, William Murphie gives as a unique look at the internal cost management and engineering planning experience acquired during the first U.S. commercialsize plant removal, recently completed at the Shippingport Atomic Power Station near Pittsburgh. The project was especially valuable as it provided a detailed comparison between estimated and actual costs. Some of the more important findings were that (1) detailed advance planning is cost effective, (2) labor costs can result in significant increases in total costs, (3) waste disposal costs can bring about substantial discrepancies between planned and realized costs, and (4) actual costs were within 10 percent of the estimated costs. Although there are several differences between the Shippingport reactor and other power plants, this project afforded the nuclear community an early opportunity to gain insights into many of the contingencies that may occur with full dismantlement.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PLANNING THE DECOMMISSIONING OF SHIPPINGPORT
    CRIMI, FP
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1984, 29 (361): : 21 - 23
  • [2] SHIPPINGPORT STATION DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT START OF PHYSICAL DECOMMISSIONING
    GIORDANO, RJ
    CRIMI, FP
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1986, 50 : S82 - S82
  • [3] SHIPPINGPORT STATION DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT ENGINEERING RESULTS
    MILLER, CE
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN NUCLEAR SOCIETY, 1983, 45 : 39 - 41
  • [4] COST LESSONS LEARNT FROM DECOMMISSIONING SHIPPINGPORT
    WOOD, J
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 1990, 35 (434): : 20 - 22
  • [5] EVALUATION OF THE SOURCE TERM FOR THE DECOMMISSIONING OF THE SHIPPINGPORT REACTOR
    MORFORD, RJ
    BUNCH, WL
    CARTER, LL
    DAUGHTRY, JW
    SCHWARZ, RA
    STINSON, WP
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NUCLEAR ENGINEERING COMPUTATION AND RADIATION SHIELDING, VOLS 1-2, 1989, : 349 - 359
  • [6] SHIPPINGPORT STATION DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT HEALTH-PHYSICS OVERVIEW
    HANDY, JW
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 1986, 50 : S81 - S81
  • [7] Decommissioning experience at BNFL
    Prescott, AC
    Willis, ASD
    [J]. JAHRESTAGUNG KERNTECHNIK 2000 - ANNUAL MEETING ON NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY 2000, 2000, : 469 - 473
  • [8] Decommissioning - a contractor's experience
    Ingham, EL
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENERGY-JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH NUCLEAR ENERGY SOCIETY, 1999, 38 (01): : 53 - 57
  • [9] Japan's decommissioning experience
    Ogawa, N
    [J]. NUCLEAR PLANT JOURNAL, 2000, 18 (04) : 41 - +
  • [10] Experience in nuclear decommissioning and waste management
    Edler, GR
    Bradbury, D
    Wood, CJ
    [J]. RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT 2000: CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS, AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2001, 2001 (01): : 191 - 200