Impact of Organic and Conventional Systems of Coffee Farming on Soil Properties and Culturable Microbial Diversity

被引:28
|
作者
Velmourougane, Kulandaivelu [1 ]
机构
[1] Coffee Board, Coffee Res Sub Stn, Post Harvest Technol Lab, Coorg 571248, Karnataka, India
来源
SCIENTIFICA | 2016年 / 2016卷
关键词
D O I
10.1155/2016/3604026
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A study was undertaken with an objective of evaluating the long-termimpacts of organic (ORG) and conventional (CON) methods of coffee farming on soil physical, chemical, biological, and microbial diversity. Electrical conductivity and bulk density were found to increase by 34% and 21%, respectively, in CON compared to ORG system, while water holding capacity was found decreased in both the systems. Significant increase in organic carbon was observed in ORG system. Major nutrients, nitrogen and potassium, levels showed inclination in both ORG and CON system, but the trend was much more pronounced in CON system. Phosphorus was found to increase in both ORG and CON system, but its availability was found to be more with CON system. In biological attributes, higher soil respiration and fluorescein diacetate activity were recorded in ORG system compared to CON system. Higher soil urease activity was observed in CON system, while dehydrogenase activity does not show significant differences between ORG and CON systems. ORG system was found to have higher macrofauna (31.4%), microbial population (34%), and microbial diversity indices compared to CON system. From the present study, it is accomplished that coffee soil under long-term ORG system has better soil properties compared to CON system.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soil microbial and nematode communities in organic and conventional farming systems
    Ristaino, J. B.
    [J]. PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2004, 94 (06) : S129 - S129
  • [2] Dynamics of soil microbial biomass and activity in conventional and organic farming systems
    Gunapala, N
    Scow, KM
    [J]. SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 30 (06): : 805 - 816
  • [3] Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming
    Martin Hartmann
    Beat Frey
    Jochen Mayer
    Paul Mäder
    Franco Widmer
    [J]. The ISME Journal, 2015, 9 : 1177 - 1194
  • [4] Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming
    Hartmann, Martin
    Frey, Beat
    Mayer, Jochen
    Maeder, Paul
    Widmer, Franco
    [J]. ISME JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (05): : 1177 - 1194
  • [5] A comparison of soil and water properties in organic and conventional farming systems in England
    Hathaway-Jenkins, L. J.
    Sakrabani, R.
    Pearce, B.
    Whitmore, A. P.
    Godwin, R. J.
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 27 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [6] Assessment of Properties of a Harkey Soil under Organic and Conventional Farming Systems
    Mendoza, Guillermo O.
    Shukla, Manoj K.
    Mexal, John G.
    Vanleeuwen, Dawn M.
    Ikemura, Yoshi
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2011, 42 (15) : 1791 - 1808
  • [7] Soil microbial communities are sensitive to differences in fertilization intensity in organic and conventional farming systems
    Lori, Martina
    Hartmann, Martin
    Kundel, Dominika
    Mayer, Jochen
    Mueller, Ralf C.
    Mader, Paul
    Krause, Hans-Martin
    [J]. FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2023, 99 (06)
  • [8] Integrated assessment of the impact of conventional and organic farming systems on soil biochemical indicators
    Futa, Barbara
    Myszura-Dymek, Magdalena
    Wesolowska, Sylwia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2024, 38 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [9] Effect of organic and conventional farming practices on soil microbial population
    Sheoran, H. S.
    Phogat, V. K.
    Dahiya, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (01): : 125 - 129
  • [10] Soil microbial biomass and organic matter fractions during transition from conventional to organic farming systems
    Santos, Valdinar B.
    Araujo, Ademir S. F.
    Leite, Luiz F. C.
    Nunes, Luis A. P. L.
    Melo, Wanderley J.
    [J]. GEODERMA, 2012, 170 : 227 - 231