ABECARNIL AND ALPRAZOLAM IN HUMANS - BEHAVIORAL, SUBJECTIVE AND REINFORCING EFFECTS

被引:0
|
作者
MUMFORD, GK
RUSH, CR
GRIFFITHS, RR
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT PSYCHIAT & BEHAV SCI,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
[2] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV,SCH MED,DEPT NEUROSCI,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Abecarnil, a novel beta-carboline, is under development for the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. This study compared the behavioral, subjective and reinforcing effects of abecarnil to those of the benzodiazepine alprazolam in 14 healthy males with histories of sedative drug abuse. Placebo, abecarnil (10, 20, 40 mg) and alprazolam (1.0, 2.0, 4.0 mg) were administered p.o. in a double-blind, cross-over design. Abecarnil and alprazolam produced comparable dose-dependent decreases in behavioral performance on balance, circular lights, digit-recall and digit-symbol-substitution tasks that peaked 2-4 hr after drug administration. Both drugs produced a profile of sedative effects and were categorized by subjects as predominantly barbiturate- or benzodiazepine-like, However, the high dose of alprazolam increased subject-ratings of sleepy, fatigued and tired; these ratings were significantly different from both placebo and all doses of abecamil. Abecarnil and alprazolam produced comparable dose-dependent increases in ratings of drug strength. The highest dose of alprazolam produced increases in Next Day ratings of drug liking, good effects, monetary value of the drug, and desire to take the drug again that were significantly greater than placebo and the highest dose of abecarnil. Abecarnil, but not alprazolam, produced increases in Next Day ratings of ''bad effects'' that were significantly greater than placebo. The highest dose of alprazolam produced increases in a direct measure of drug reinforcement (drug vs, money Multiple-Choice Procedure) that were significantly greater than placebo and all doses of abecarnil. Collectively, these data suggest that abecarnil may have less potential for abuse than alprazolam in a sedative-abusing population.
引用
收藏
页码:570 / 580
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alprazolam and DN-2327 (Pazinaclone) in Humans: Psychomotor, Memory, Subjective, and Reinforcing Effects
    Mumford, Geoffrey K.
    Rush, Craig R.
    Griffiths, Roland R.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 3 (01) : 39 - 48
  • [2] Behavioral effects of alprazolam in humans
    Kelly, TH
    Foltin, RW
    Serpick, E
    Fischman, MW
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 8 (01): : 47 - 57
  • [3] REINFORCING AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF METHYLPHENIDATE IN HUMANS
    CHAIT, LD
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03): : 281 - 288
  • [4] BENZPHETAMINE - SUBJECTIVE AND REINFORCING EFFECTS IN HUMANS
    CHAIT, LD
    UHLENHUTH, EH
    JOHANSON, CE
    [J]. FEDERATION PROCEEDINGS, 1986, 45 (04) : 1060 - 1060
  • [5] The effects of memantine on the subjective, reinforcing and cardiovascular effects of cocaine in humans
    Collins, ED
    Ward, AS
    McDowell, DM
    Foltin, RW
    Fischman, MW
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 9 (07): : 587 - 598
  • [6] Reinforcing, subjective, and performance effects of lorazepam and diphenhydramine in humans
    Mumford, GK
    Silverman, K
    Griffiths, RR
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 4 (04) : 421 - 430
  • [7] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE REINFORCING AND SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF EPHEDRINE IN HUMANS
    CHAIT, LD
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1994, 113 (3-4) : 381 - 387
  • [8] Alprazolam attenuates the behavioral effects of D-amphetamine in humans
    Rush, CR
    Stoops, WW
    Wagner, FP
    Hays, LR
    Glaser, PEA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 24 (04) : 410 - 420
  • [9] Physiological, subjective and reinforcing effects of oral and intravenous cocaine in humans
    Brandi J. Smith
    Hendree E. Jones
    Roland R. Griffiths
    [J]. Psychopharmacology, 2001, 156 : 435 - 444
  • [10] Physiological, subjective and reinforcing effects of oral and intravenous cocaine in humans
    Smith, BJ
    Jones, HE
    Griffiths, RR
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 156 (04) : 435 - 444