SHOULD THE STATES ADOPT RULES PATTERNED AFTER THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE

被引：0

|

作者：

CHRISTENSEN, AS

机构：

来源：

DEFENSE LAW JOURNAL | 1979年 / 28卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：101 / 117

页数：17

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] SHOULD TEXAS ADOPT FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
WENDORF, HD
[J]. BAYLOR LAW REVIEW, 1976, 28 (02) : 249 - 283
[2] THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
BERTELSMAN, WO
[J]. TRIAL, 1985, 21 (09): : 55 - 63
[3] THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE - 6 YEARS AFTER
ROTHSTEIN, PF
[J]. FEDERAL BAR NEWS & JOURNAL, 1981, 40 (04): : 282 - &
[4] THE THEORY OF DISCRETION IN THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
MENGLER, TM
[J]. IOWA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 74 (02) : 413 - 466
[5] EXPERT WITNESSES AND FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
MCELHANEY, JW
[J]. MERCER LAW REVIEW, 1977, 28 (02) : 463 - 495
[6] HEARSAY AND NEW FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
WHITE, RA
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE PATENT OFFICE SOCIETY, 1975, 57 (11): : 713 - 725
[7] THE DEFINITION OF HEARSAY IN THE FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE
WELLBORN, OG
[J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1982, 61 (01) : 49 - 93
[8] SYMPOSIUM ON FEDERAL-RULES OF EVIDENCE - FOREWORD
不详
[J]. TEMPLE LAW REVIEW, 1976, 49 (04): : 860 - 866
[9] VIRGINIA AND THE FEDERAL-RULES
GREER, TK
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1961, 47 (05) : 906 - 923
[10] THE FRAGMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL-RULES
FRIEDMAN, B
CHEMERINSKY, E
[J]. JUDICATURE, 1995, 79 (02) : 67 - 73

← 1 2 3 4 5 →