THE PROBLEM OF HGSTORICITY OF JESUS CHRIST-IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM OF THE DEMYTHOLOGIZATION

turBultmann's existentialist hermeneutics focuses on the distinctions such as myth-existence, historical Jesus-Christ-Event. Against Bultmann, Ebeling demonstrates that it isn't possible to make a distinction between historical Jesus and Christ Event, since linguisticality of human existence prevents to demythologize Christian kerygma from eschatological mythology. Ebeling has never rejected the concept of the demythologization, but for him, it means establishing language of the existence. Pannenberg agrees with Ebeling about establishing Christian kerygma on the basis of the history. Especially he applies to Collingwood's philosophy in order to rationalize and historicize cross and resurrection of the Jesus-Christ. Both Pannenberg and Moltmann get their own theological concepts from Jewish apocalyptic tradition and point beyond modern historicism to conception of the apocalyptical truth. In order to understand historicity of Jesus-Christ in the light of the apocalyptical promise, while Pannenberg has a view of historical unity, Moltmann signs dialectical relationship between the suffering and the hope. Ebeling's demythologization coincides with their theology in order to ciriticize Bultmann's demythologization and to reconcile modern historicism and view of apocalyptical history.