COMPARISON OF POLARIZATION HANDLING METHODS IN COHERENT OPTICAL-SYSTEMS

被引:42
|
作者
NOE, R
RODLER, HJ
EBBERG, A
GAUKEL, G
NOLL, B
WITTMANN, J
AURACHER, F
机构
[1] Corporate Research and Development, Otto-Hahn-Ring 6, D-8000 München 83
[2] Corporate Research and Development, Miichen 83, ZFE ME FKE 33 Otto-Hahn-Ring 6
关键词
D O I
10.1109/50.90934
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Coherent optical transmission systems require that the polarization of the received signal and the local oscillator are matched. Endless polarization control, polarization diversity, and data-induced polarization switching are the most promising solutions for this problem. However, in spite of a host of publications, no clear favorite has emerged, maybe because few laboratories have implemented more than one method and no direct comparison was ever made. In this paper we directly compare these three methods, and active, data-synchronous polarization switching, for the first time to our knowledge. We will see that endless polarization control is potentially the most powerful candidate, however, the choice of polarization control devices remains questionable. Polarization diversity is as versatile as polarization control and is potential the fastest method; however, it yields lower receiver sensitivity. Endless control or a well-designed diversity receiver should be used for coherent trunk systems. Data-induced polarization switching is restricted to FSK systems. It promises a loss span similar to that of diversity but is far simpler which makes it recommendable for FSK distribution systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1366
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条