Comparative evaluation of the role of single and multiple blood specimens in the outcome of blood cultures using BacT/ALERT 3D (automated) blood culture system in a tertiary care hospital

被引:5
|
作者
Elantamilan, D. [1 ]
Lyngdoh, Valarie Wihiwot [1 ]
Khyriem, Annie B. [1 ]
Rajbongshi, Jyotismita [1 ]
Bora, Ishani [1 ]
Devi, Surbala Thingujam [1 ]
Bhattacharyya, Prithwis [2 ]
Barman, Himesh [3 ]
机构
[1] North Eastern Indira Gandhi Reg Inst Hlth & Med S, Dept Microbiol, Shillong 793018, Meghalaya, India
[2] North Eastern Indira Gandhi Reg Inst Hlth & Med S, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
[3] North Eastern Indira Gandhi Reg Inst Hlth & Med S, Dept Paediat, Shillong, Meghalaya, India
关键词
BacT; ALERT; 3D; bacteremia; blood stream infections; FA plus; number of samples;
D O I
10.4103/0972-5229.190371
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is a leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients. The mortality directly attributable to BSI has been estimated to be around 16% and 40% in general hospital population and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) population, respectively. The detection rate of these infections increases with the number of blood samples obtained for culture. The newer continuous monitoring automated blood culture systems with enhanced culture media show increased yield and sensitivity. Hence, we aimed at studying the role of single and multiple blood specimens from different sites at the same time in the outcome of automated blood culture system. Materials and Methods and Results: A total of 1054 blood culture sets were analyzed over 1 year, the sensitivity of one, two, and three samples in a set was found to be 85.67%, 96.59%, and 100%, respectively, which showed a statistically significant difference (P 0.0001). Similar findings were seen in few more studies, however, among individual organisms in contrast to other studies, the isolation rates of Gram-positive bacteria were less than that of Gram-negative Bacilli with one (or first) sample in a blood culture set. In our study, despite using BacT/ALERT three-dimensional continuous culture monitoring system with FAN plus culture bottles, 15% of positive cultures would have been missed if only a single sample was collected in a blood culture set. Conclusion: The variables like the volume of blood and number of samples collected from different sites still play a major role in the outcome of these automated blood culture systems.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 533
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative evaluation of BACTEC FX, BacT/ALERT 3D, and BacT/ALERT VIRTUO-automated blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures
    Li, Zhengkang
    Liu, Suling
    Chen, Huimin
    Zhang, Xinqiang
    Ling, Yong
    Zhang, Ni
    Hou, Tieying
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2022, 77 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [2] Evaluation of negative results of BacT/Alert 3D automated blood culture system
    Kocoglu, ME
    Bayram, A
    Balci, I
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (03) : 257 - 259
  • [3] EVALUATION OF ROUTINE ANAEROBIC BLOOD CULTURES IN THE BACT/ALERT BLOOD CULTURE SYSTEM
    BANNISTER, ER
    WOODS, GL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1995, 104 (03) : 279 - 282
  • [4] In vitro Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples
    Menchinelli, Giulia
    Liotti, Flora Marzia
    Fiori, Barbara
    De Angelis, Giulia
    D'Inzeo, Tiziana
    Giordano, Lilian
    Posteraro, Brunella
    Sabatucci, Michela
    Sanguinetti, Maurizio
    Spanu, Teresa
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [5] Microbiological Profile of Neonatal Septicemia by Automated Blood Culture System (BacT/ALERT) at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Jamnagar, Gujarat, India
    Bindiya, J. Ghedia
    Shah, Manish R.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 33 (59B) : 17 - 22
  • [6] Comparison of time-to-detection of Mindray TDR and BacT/ALERT®3D blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures
    Aydemir, Ozlem
    Ormanoglu, Gokcen
    Koroglu, Mehmet
    Aydemir, Yusuf
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2024, 79 (03) : 168 - 173
  • [7] Evaluation of negative results of BacT/alert 3D automated blood culture system (vol 43, pg 257, 2005)
    Kocoglu, ME
    Bayram, A
    Balci, I
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (04) : 381 - 381
  • [8] Comparison of Clinical Performance Between BacT/Alert Virtuo and BacT/Alert 3D Blood Culture Systems
    Kim, Seong Chun
    Lee, Seungjun
    Kim, Sunjoo
    Cho, Oh-Hyun
    Park, Hyunwoong
    Yu, Seong-Mi
    ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 39 (03) : 237 - 242
  • [9] Evaluation of the BacT/ALERT and BACTEC 9240 automated blood culture systems for growth time of Brucella species in a Turkish tertiary hospital
    Baysallar, Mehmet
    Aydogan, Hakan
    Kilic, Abdullah
    Kucukkaraaslan, Ayten
    Senses, Zeynep
    Doganci, Levent
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2006, 12 (07): : BR235 - BR238
  • [10] In vitro Evaluation of BACT/ALERT® VIRTUO®, BACT/ALERT 3D®, and BACTEC™ FX Automated Blood Culture Systems for Detection of Microbial Pathogens Using Simulated Human Blood Samples (vol 10, 221, 2019)
    Menchinelli, Giulia
    Liotti, Flora Marzia
    Fiori, Barbara
    De Angelis, Giulia
    D'Inzeo, Tiziana
    Giordano, Liliana
    Posteraro, Brunella
    Sabbatucci, Michela
    Sanguinetti, Maurizio
    Spanu, Teresa
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 10