Teleophthalmology: improving patient outcomes?

被引:86
|
作者
Sreelatha, Omana Kesary [1 ]
Ramesh, Sathyamangalam VenkataSubbu [2 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Muscat, Oman
[2] Manipal Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Optometry, Manipal 576104, Karnataka, India
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2016年 / 10卷
关键词
teleophthalmology; patient satisfaction; patient outcomes; tele-ROP; tele; diabetic retinopathy; teleglaucoma;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S80487
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Teleophthalmology is gaining importance as an effective eye care delivery modality worldwide. In many developing countries, teleophthalmology is being utilized to provide quality eye care to the underserved urban population and the unserved remote rural population. Over the years, technological innovations have led to improvement in evidence and teleophthalmology has evolved from a research tool to a clinical tool. The majority of the current teleophthalmology services concentrate on patient screening and appropriate referral to experts. Specialty care using teleophthalmology services for the pediatric group includes screening as well as providing timely care for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Among geriatric eye diseases, specialty teleophthalmology care is focused toward screening and referral for diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (ARMD), and other sight-threatening conditions. Comprehensive vision screening and refractive error services are generally covered as part of most of the teleophthalmology methods. Over the past decades, outcome assessment of health care system includes patients' assessments on their health, care, and services they receive. Outcomes, by and large, remain the ultimate validators of the effectiveness and quality of medical care. Teleophthalmology produces the same desired clinical outcome as the traditional system. Remote portals allow specialists to provide care over a larger region, thereby improving health outcomes and increasing accessibility of specialty care to a larger population. A high satisfaction level and acceptance is reported in the majority of the studies because of increased accessibility and reduced traveling cost and time. Considering the improved quality of patient care and patient satisfaction reported for these telemedicine services, this review explores how teleophthalmology helps to improve patient outcomes.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:285 / 295
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving patient outcomes
    Cooper, E
    Blamey, S
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 75 (10) : 924 - 925
  • [2] Improving patient outcomes
    Elgie, R
    BIPOLAR DISORDERS, 2004, 6 : 22 - 23
  • [3] Electronic patient records and teleophthalmology
    Schargus, M.
    Michelson, G.
    Grehn, F.
    OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2011, 108 (05): : 473 - 483
  • [4] Patient satisfaction with teleophthalmology in ocular oncology
    Campbell, Paige
    Crump, Trafford
    Weis, Ezekiel
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [5] Literally Improving Patient Outcomes
    Prasauskas, Ruta
    Spoo, Lori
    HOME HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2006, 18 (04): : 270 - 271
  • [6] Simulation: Improving patient outcomes
    Smith, Abi
    Siassakos, Dimitrios
    Crofts, Joanna
    Draycott, Tim
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 37 (03) : 151 - 156
  • [7] The Johns Hopkins Patient Engagement Program: Improving Patient Engagement, Improving Patient Outcomes
    Schechter, Nicole E.
    Wegener, Stephen T.
    QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 31 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [8] Improving patient outcomes in pulmonary hypertension
    Galie, Nazzareno
    McLaughlin, Vallerie V.
    Rubin, Lewis J.
    Simonneau, Gerald
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2015, 24 (138): : 550 - 551
  • [9] Focus on hypertriglyceridemia: Improving patient outcomes
    Watson, Karol E.
    Codario, Ronald A.
    Mason, Carol M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2007, 19 (12): : 3 - 14
  • [10] Improving patient outcomes with ultrasound elastography
    Barr, Richard G.
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 : 49 - 52