Effective general practice: audit and feedback for the primary series of immunisations

被引:5
|
作者
Reynolds, Gary [1 ,2 ]
Timo, Mareta [2 ]
Dev, Anjileena [1 ]
Poole, Tracey [1 ]
Turner, Nikki [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Conectus Ctr, Immunisat Advisory Ctr, PB 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Pasifika Horizon Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Children; general practice; immunisation schedule; medical audit; New Zealand;
D O I
10.1071/HC14040
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: General practice immunisation audits do not always match the national rates recorded on the New Zealand (NZ) National Immunisation Register (NIR). AIM: To complete audits at one general practice for infants requiring the primary series of immunisations (6-week, 3-month and 5-month vaccines) over a 12-month period and compare findings with the NIR audit. METHODS: A manual and electronic practice management system (PMS) audit were compared with identical NIR audit parameters for completion of the 5-month vaccination from 1 February 2011 to 1-February 2012. All three results were then combined with further sub-audits of the total practice newborn population to produce a multifaceted audit, identifying further eligible patients. The NIR database query tool was used to corroborate data on partially immunised and unimmunised patients identified. RESULTS: All three initial audits produced different results for vaccinated and eligible patients: NIR 31/36; PMS audit 39/43; manual audit 41/48. The multifaceted audit identified 48 eligible infants. All 48 (100%) started their primary series-95.8% (46 of 48) fully immunised; 4.2% (2 of 48) partially immunised, missing only one injection. None were unimmunised, contrary to initial audits. Lower levels of timeliness of delivery were confirmed for this practice, with 52.1% (25 of 48) immunised on time. D ISCUSSION: Results show 9.7% higher levels of immunisation than reported by NIR statistics for this practice (95.8% vs 86.1%), above current NZ government and World Health Organization targets. The multifaceted audit produced the best estimate of eligible patients and identified deficiencies in vaccine delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 48
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Audit in general practice
    M Joscelyne
    British Dental Journal, 1998, 184 (9) : 422 - 422
  • [2] Exploring effective patient feedback methods for eHealth in general practice
    Nasori, Mana
    Mak-van der Vossen, Marianne
    Holtrop, Marije
    Bont, Jettie
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [4] Audit in general practice:: how much and how complete?: Frequency of audit in general practice
    Dean, P
    McKinley, RK
    Farooqi, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2001, 19 (02) : 101 - 102
  • [5] What motivates general practitioners to change practice behaviour? A qualitative study of audit and feedback group sessions in Dutch general practice
    van Braak, Marije
    Visser, Mechteld
    Holtrop, Marije
    Muller, Ilona Statius
    Bont, Jettie
    van Dijk, Nynke
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (05):
  • [6] AUDIT IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    JONES, K
    DUNLEAVEY, J
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6825): : 509 - 509
  • [7] AUDIT IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    HOUGHTON, G
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6777): : 660 - 660
  • [8] AUDIT IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    MOORE, R
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS, 1984, 34 (259): : 115 - 116
  • [9] AUDIT IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    BAKER, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 304 (6840): : 1455 - 1456
  • [10] AUDIT IN GENERAL-PRACTICE
    BROWN, RK
    HALDANE, DA
    ROY, W
    SWEENEY, B
    WILSON, F
    COLVILLE, RLK
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1982, 284 (6308): : 53 - 54