SENSITIVITY AND UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS OF ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES INVOLVING MULTIPLE DECISIONS

被引:10
|
作者
JAE, M [1 ]
MILICI, AD [1 ]
KASTENBERG, WE [1 ]
APOSTOLAKIS, GE [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT MECH AEROSP & NUCL ENGN,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
关键词
ACCIDENT MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; DECISION ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.13182/NT93-A34867
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
A framework for assessing severe accident management strategies is presented using a new analytical tool, namely, influence diagrams. This framework includes multiple and sequential decisions, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty propagation, and is applied to a proposed set of strategies for a pressurized water reactor station blackout sequence. The influence diagram associated with these strategies is constructed and evaluated. Each decision variable, represented by a node in the influence diagram, has an uncertainty distribution associated with it. Using the mean value of these distributions, a best estimate assessment is performed, and each strategy is ranked with respect to the conditional frequency of early containment failure (ECF). For the preferred alternative, the sensitivity of the results to values of the input variables is investigated. The sensitivity of the ranking itself is then considered. The distributions of the uncertain variables are also propagated through the influence diagram to rank the alternatives with respect to the uncertainty associated with the calculated conditional frequency of ECF Finally, the sensitivity of the variance of the output distribution, given the preferred decision alternative, to the uncertainty of the input variables is investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 36
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A framework for assessing hydrogen management strategies involving multiple decisions
    Lee, SD
    Suh, KY
    Park, GC
    Jae, M
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2495 - 2501
  • [2] Ranking strategies for stormwater management under uncertainty: Sensitivity analysis
    Reda, ALL
    Beck, MB
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 36 (05) : 357 - 371
  • [3] UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS UNDER ACCIDENT SCENARIOS
    Gomes, Daniel de Souza
    Teixeira e Silva, Antonio
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [4] Time uncertainty analysis method for level 2 human reliability analysis of severe accident management strategies
    Suh, Young A.
    Kim, Jaewhan
    Park, Soo Yong
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 53 (02) : 484 - 497
  • [5] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of flood risk management decisions based on stationary and nonstationary model choices
    Rehan, Balqis M.
    Hall, Jim W.
    3RD EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT (FLOODRISK 2016), 2016, 7
  • [6] DECISIONS UNDER UNCERTAINTY INVOLVING EXTREMELY LARGE NUMBERS OF POSSIBLE STRATEGIES + STATES OF WORLD
    ALFANDARYALEXANDER, M
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1964, 12 : B157 - &
  • [7] Analysis of the financial risk under uncertainty in the municipal solid waste management involving multiple stakeholders
    Danae Diaz-Barriga-Fernandez, Alicia
    Ezequiel Santibanez-Aguilar, Jose
    Napoles-Rivera, Fabricio
    Maria Ponce-Ortega, Jose
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 117 : 433 - 450
  • [8] Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of the Generic Containment SB-LOCA Accident
    Povilaitis, Mantas
    Urbonavicius, Egidijus
    Kelm, Stephan
    24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR NEW EUROPE, (NENE 2015), 2015,
  • [9] Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis using an accident consequence assessment code OSCAAR
    Homma, T
    Tomita, K
    Inoue, Y
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 927 - 933
  • [10] A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions
    Hall, Jim
    Solomatine, Dimitri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2008, 6 (02) : 85 - 98