EXTRAVASCULAR EXTRAVASATION OF RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL AND LOW-OSMOLAR AGENTS IN THE RAT THIGH

被引:41
|
作者
COHAN, RH
LEDER, RA
BOLICK, D
HERZBERG, AJ
HEDLUND, LW
WHEELER, CT
HELMS, MJ
DUNNICK, NR
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,DURHAM,NC 27710
[2] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT COMMUNITY & FAMILY MED,DURHAM,NC 27710
关键词
Contrast media; Extravasation; Low-osmolality contrast media; Radiographic contrast media;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199005000-00006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
We compared the damage resulting from intradermal injection of four commonly used radiographic contrast media in laboratory rats. Sixty percent meglumine diatrizoate (Reno M 60) and ioxaglate (Hexabrix) produced significantly more ulceration and crusting on gross inspection and more necrosis, edema, and hemorrhage on histologic evaluation than iopamidol 300 (Isovue) or 0.9% (normal) saline. Thirty percent meglumine diatrizoate (Reno M Dip) had an intermediate toxicity, resulting in significantly more visible swelling and more microscopically detected hemorrhage than iopamidol or saline, but less ulceration/crusting and necrosis than Reno M 60 and ioxaglate. Since the three contrast agents of similar osmolality produced different degrees of tissue damage, our results suggest that factors other than high osmolality are partially responsible for determining the severity of injuries from extravasated contrast media. © Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 510
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IONATED RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - COMPARISON OF LOW-OSMOLAR WITH CONVENTIONAL IONIC AGENTS
    RUBIN, JD
    COHAN, RH
    CURRENT OPINION IN RADIOLOGY, 1991, 3 (05) : 637 - 645
  • [2] ADVANTAGES OF THE NEW LOW-OSMOLAR RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST-MEDIA
    BESTER, L
    BAGG, M
    SCHER, A
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1986, 70 (13): : 796 - 798
  • [3] COSTS OF LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA
    SPRING, DB
    QUESENBERRY, CP
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 266 (08): : 1081 - 1082
  • [4] SELECTIVE USE OF LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA
    DEBATIN, JF
    COHAN, RH
    LEDER, RA
    ZAKRZEWSKI, CB
    DUNNICK, NR
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (01) : 17 - 21
  • [5] COMPARISON OF HIGH-OSMOLAR AND LOW-OSMOLAR RADIOGRAPHIC CONTRAST-MEDIA IN QUANTITATIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY
    JOST, S
    RAFFLENBEUL, W
    GERHARDT, U
    NELLESSEN, U
    REIL, GH
    HECKER, H
    LICHTLEN, P
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KARDIOLOGIE, 1988, 77 (12): : 755 - 766
  • [7] THE NEW LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA - A SIMPLE GUIDE
    DAWSON, P
    GRAINGER, RG
    PITFIELD, J
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1983, 34 (02) : 221 - 226
  • [8] COMPARISON OF LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA IN CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY
    PECK, RJ
    BULL, MJ
    CUMBERLAND, DC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1985, 58 (696): : 1177 - 1178
  • [9] ACTIVATION OF PLATELETS BY LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA - DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF IONIC AND NONIONIC AGENTS
    HARDEMAN, MR
    KONIJNENBERG, A
    STURK, A
    REEKERS, JA
    RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (02) : 563 - 566
  • [10] THE ANTICOAGULANT EFFECTS OF IONIC AND NONIONIC LOW-OSMOLAR CONTRAST-MEDIA IN DOGS
    KURISU, Y
    TADA, S
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) : 686 - 688