Negotiating human research ethics Case notes from anthropologists in the field

被引:15
|
作者
Chenhall, Richard [1 ]
Senior, Kate [2 ]
Belton, Suzanne [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat Hlth, Ctr Hlth & Soc, Med Anthropol, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Darwin, NT, Australia
[3] Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Publ Hlth, Darwin, NT, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8322.2011.00827.x
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
The human ethics issues surrounding the conduct of health science research have been the subject of increasing debate among biomedical and social science researchers in recent years. Ethics procedures in health-science research are typically concerned with protecting anonymity and confidentiality, and are tailored to work that primarily uses quantitative methodologies. For qualitative research in the health social sciences, a different set of ethical issues often arises in the research process. This article examines three case studies of qualitative researchers working with Indigenous Australian communities, focusing on the researchers' experiences with ethics committees and how they approached a range of ethical issues arising in the course of their research. Key issues include: obtaining informed consent for participant observation; the evolving nature of qualitative research; the difficulties in foreseeing changes in approach; and the distinction between the research team and the researched in participatory action research. © RAI 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 17
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Notes on Technology Devices in Research: Negotiating Field Boundaries and Relationships
    Mainsah, Henry
    Proitz, Lin
    [J]. QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2019, 25 (03) : 271 - 277
  • [2] Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee
    Koepsell, David
    Brinkman, Willem-Paul
    Pont, Sylvia
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (04) : 1033 - 1048
  • [3] Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee
    David Koepsell
    Willem-Paul Brinkman
    Sylvia Pont
    [J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2015, 21 : 1033 - 1048
  • [4] Field research, ethics, and interdisciplinarity Notes on new challenges
    Suman, Anna Berti
    [J]. RAGION PRATICA, 2023, 60 (01) : 187 - 190
  • [5] Negotiating with communities: The politics and ethics of research
    Manderson, L
    Wilson, RP
    [J]. HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1998, 57 (02) : 215 - 216
  • [6] Case studies in human research ethics
    Bertholf, RL
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2001, 47 (06) : S14 - S14
  • [7] Evolution of Attitudes in the Field of Human Research Ethics
    Escobar-Melo, Hugo
    Diaz Amado, Eduardo
    [J]. UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 7 (01) : 73 - 96
  • [8] Research Ethics Committees in the Field of Health-Related Human Research - A European Perspective and the Case of Austria
    Stuehlinger, Verena
    Hackl, Michael
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2014, 21 (04) : 387 - 400
  • [9] Practicing Ethics and Ethical Practice: The Case of Anthropologists and Military Humanitarians
    Plemmons, Dena
    Albro, Robert
    [J]. HUMANITY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS HUMANITARIANISM AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 3 (02) : 179 - 197
  • [10] A Field Training Guide for Human Subjects Research Ethics
    Merritt, Maria W.
    Labrique, Alain B.
    Katz, Joanne
    Rashid, Mahbubur
    West, Keith P., Jr.
    Pettit, Joan
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (10)