UAV LiDAR for below-canopy forest surveys

被引:97
|
作者
Chisholm, Ryan A. [1 ,2 ]
Cui, Jinqiang [3 ]
Lum, Shawn K. Y. [4 ]
Chen, Ben M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, 14 Sci Dr 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[2] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa, Ancon, Panama
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Grad Sch Integrat Sci & Engn, Singapore 117456, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Nat Sci & Sci Educ Acad Grp, Natl Inst Educ, Singapore 637616, Singapore
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117576, Singapore
来源
JOURNAL OF UNMANNED VEHICLE SYSTEMS | 2013年 / 1卷 / 01期
关键词
LiDAR; forest survey; tree; diameter measurement; unmanned aerial vehicle; biomass estimation;
D O I
10.1139/juvs-2013-0017
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Remote sensing tools are increasingly being used to survey forest structure. Most current methods rely on GPS signals, which are available in above-canopy surveys or in below-canopy surveys of open forests, but may be absent in below-canopy environments of dense forests. We trialled a technology that facilitates mobile surveys in GPS-denied below-canopy forest environments. The platform consists of a battery-powered UAV mounted with a LiDAR. It lacks a GPS or any other localisation device. The vehicle is capable of an 8 min flight duration and autonomous operation but was remotely piloted in the present study. We flew the UAV around a 20 m x 20 m patch of roadside trees and developed postprocessing software to estimate the diameter-at-breast-height (DBH) of 12 trees that were detected by the LiDAR. The method detected 73% of trees greater than 200 mm DBH within 3 m of the flight path. Smaller and more distant trees could not be detected reliably. The UAV-based DBH estimates of detected trees were positively correlated with the human-based estimates (R-2 = 0.45, p = 0.017) with a median absolute error of 18.1%, a root-mean-square error of 25.1% and a bias of -1.2%. We summarise the main current limitations of this technology and outline potential solutions. The greatest gains in precision could be achieved through use of a localisation device. The long-term factor limiting the deployment of below-canopy UAV surveys is likely to be battery technology.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Estimating Tree Diameters from an Autonomous Below-Canopy UAV with Mounted LiDAR
    Chisholm, Ryan A.
    Rodriguez-Ronderos, M. Elizabeth
    Lin, Feng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)
  • [3] Below-canopy and soil CO2 fluxes in a ponderosa pine forest
    Law, BE
    Baldocchi, DD
    Anthoni, PM
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 94 (3-4) : 171 - 188
  • [4] Terrestrial laser scanning reveals below-canopy bat trait relationships with forest structure
    Blakey, Rachel V.
    Law, Brad S.
    Kingsford, Richard T.
    Stoklosa, Jakub
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 198 : 40 - 51
  • [5] Edaphic heterogeneity related to below-canopy water and solute fluxes in a Canarian laurel forest
    Jesús R. Aboal
    Santiago Saavedra
    José Manuel Hernández-Moreno
    Plant and Soil, 2015, 387 : 177 - 188
  • [6] Edaphic heterogeneity related to below-canopy water and solute fluxes in a Canarian laurel forest
    Aboal, Jesus R.
    Saavedra, Santiago
    Manuel Hernandez-Moreno, Jose
    PLANT AND SOIL, 2015, 387 (1-2) : 177 - 188
  • [7] Airborne lidar point cloud-based below-canopy line-of-sight visibility estimator
    Lee, Heezin
    Blundell, S. Bruce
    Starek, Michael J.
    Harrisd, John G.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 7
  • [8] Canopy structure and below-canopy temperatures interact to shape seedling response to disturbance in a Rocky Mountain subalpine forest
    Carlson, Amanda R.
    Sibold, Jason S.
    Negron, Jose F.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 472
  • [9] Lidar intensity for improved detection of inundation below the forest canopy
    Megan W. Lang
    Greg W. McCarty
    Wetlands, 2009, 29 : 1166 - 1178
  • [10] LIDAR INTENSITY FOR IMPROVED DETECTION OF INUNDATION BELOW THE FOREST CANOPY
    Lang, Megan W.
    McCarty, Greg W.
    WETLANDS, 2009, 29 (04) : 1166 - 1178