Dynamics of control in construction project teams

被引:27
|
作者
Tuuli, Martin Morgan [1 ]
Rowlinson, Steve [2 ]
Koh, Tas Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Westminster, Dept Property & Construct, London, England
[2] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Real Estate & Construct, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Empowerment; formal control; Hong Kong; informal control; portfolio of control;
D O I
10.1080/01446190903365657
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Control is pervasive in construction project environments. The management of projects through various planning and control tools has therefore been described essentially as rebureaucratization which increases control over individuals, teams and organizations through ideologies of efficiency and performativity. Yet certain characteristics of the project setting make it an ideal climate for the empowerment of individuals and teams. The manifestations of control in five construction project management teams involved in two ongoing construction projects in Hong Kong are examined. The interpretive and exploratory focus of the study favoured the use of a qualitative research design and the case study approach in particular. Control is viewed as all devices and systems employed to ensure that acts, behaviours, outcomes and decisions of individuals, teams and organizations are consistent with meeting organizational or project goals, objectives and strategies. The findings indicate that a portfolio of control modes is implemented in project teams comprising both formal (i.e. behaviour-and outcome-based) and informal (i.e. clan-and self-based) control mechanisms which are not necessarily incompatible. While formal control remains the primary control mode, a portfolio of control appears necessary to augment the inadequacies of formal control due to the evolving nature of the project environment.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 202
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Control modes and mechanisms in construction project teams: drivers and consequences
    Tuuli, Martin Morgan
    Rowlinson, Steve
    Koh, Tas Yong
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (05) : 451 - 465
  • [2] Dynamics of engagement in project teams
    Pereira Nascimento, Luan David
    Oliveira, Thiago
    Medeiros Junior, Josue Vitor
    Gurgel, Andre Morais
    REVISTA DE GESTAO E SECRETARIADO-GESEC, 2021, 12 (01): : 105 - 131
  • [3] A qualitative study into trust in construction project teams
    Ong, Eric M. S.
    Zou, Patrick X. W.
    McGeorge, Denny
    PROCEEDINGS OF CRIOCM 2007 INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 437 - 450
  • [4] Customer focus competencies and the dynamics of project teams
    Bole, Velimir
    Fink, Laura
    Prasnikar, Janez
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) : 198 - 214
  • [5] A people and information finder for virtual construction project teams
    Duke, A
    BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING, 1998, 17 : 198 - 203
  • [6] Factors contributing towards the effectiveness of construction project teams
    Kwofie, Titus Ebenezer
    Alhassan, Abraham
    Botchway, Edward
    Afranie, Isaac
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 15 (02) : 170 - 178
  • [7] The concept of project space: Studying construction project teams from a spatial perspective
    Bosch-Sijtsema, Petra M.
    Tjell, Janni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (07) : 1312 - 1321
  • [8] Based on the System Dynamics construction phase of the project cost control Study
    Yan, Wen Zhou
    Chen, Peng
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-4, 2014, 501-504 : 2691 - 2694
  • [9] Trust and knowledge sharing in project teams in construction industry of Pakistan: moderating role of perceived behavioral control
    Ul Haq, Saif
    Khan, Kamran Aziz
    Hafeez, Hira
    Chughtai, Muhammad Ahsan
    KYBERNETES, 2023, 52 (09) : 3729 - 3757
  • [10] Emerging ICT trends in construction project teams: A Delphi survey
    Brewer, Graham
    Gajendran, Thayaparan
    Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 2009, 14 : 81 - 97