Managing the Review Process in Accounting Research: Advice from Authors and Editors

被引:12
|
作者
Dalton, Derek W. [1 ]
Harp, Nancy L. [1 ]
Oler, Derek K. [2 ]
Widener, Sally K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Clemson, SC 29631 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
来源
ISSUES IN ACCOUNTING EDUCATION | 2016年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
research; publishing; review process; doctoral students;
D O I
10.2308/iace-50979
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to provide advice to accounting doctoral students and new accounting Ph.D.s on managing the review process. We also hope that our advice and suggestions will assist more experienced accounting faculty in their research endeavors. We offer suggestions from the point of view of researchers at various stages in their career. We also interview a variety of current and former journal editors and provide their suggestions and insights. We first provide suggestions to help position the article so as to receive a more helpful review. We then discuss strategies for responding to the editorial process and provide specific advice for handling various editorial decisions including a rejection, a reject-and-resubmit, a revise-and-resubmit, and an acceptance. We build upon prior research by providing a summary of advice for each type of editorial decision and by providing advice and suggestions from editors and associate editors at a wide range of accounting journals.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 252
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advice for authors from the editors of Perspectives on Medical Education: Getting your research published
    Varpio, Lara
    Driessen, Erik
    Maggio, Lauren
    Lingard, Lorelei
    Winston, Kalman
    Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
    Nagler, Alisa
    Cleland, Jennifer
    Schonrock-Adema, Johanna
    Paradis, Elise
    Morcke, Anne Mette
    Hu, Wendy
    Hay, Margaret
    Tolsgaard, Martin G.
    PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 7 (06) : 343 - 347
  • [2] THE MANUSCRIPT REVIEW PROCESS AND ADVICE TO PROSPECTIVE AUTHORS
    BRUNN, SD
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1988, 40 (01): : 8 - 14
  • [3] Ethical Practice in the Accounting Publishing Process: Contrasting Opinions of Authors and Editors
    Susan C. Borkowski
    Mary Jeanne Welsh
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2000, 25 : 15 - 31
  • [4] Ethical practice in the accounting publishing process: Contrasting opinions of authors and editors
    Borkowski, SC
    Welsh, MJ
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2000, 25 (01) : 15 - 31
  • [5] Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience peer review process, with advice for authors
    Young, Simon N.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 33 (01): : 7 - 9
  • [6] Managing suspected research misconduct - Authors, editors, and systematic reviewers should protect the pubic from unsound research data
    Young, Charles
    Godlee, Fiona
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 334 (7590): : 378 - 379
  • [7] A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process
    Earnshaw, JJ
    Farndon, JR
    Guillou, PJ
    Johnson, CD
    Murie, JA
    Murray, GD
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2000, 82 (04) : 133 - 135
  • [8] The manuscript review process - The proper roles of authors, referees, and editors
    Bedeian, AG
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INQUIRY, 2003, 12 (04) : 331 - 338
  • [9] Letter from the Editors: Advice for JAAD reviewers that may be of interest to authors and readers
    Alam, Murad
    Levin, Nikki A.
    Grant-Kels, Jane M.
    Elston, Dirk M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 88 (04) : 785 - 786
  • [10] Writing for publication in early childhood education: Survey data from editors and advice to authors
    Gargiulo R.
    Jalongo M.R.
    Motari J.
    Early Childhood Education Journal, 2001, 29 (1) : 17 - 23