A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED SINGLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF NAFARELIN ACETATE WITH BUSERELIN IN LONG-PROTOCOL GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE ANALOG CONTROLLED IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION CYCLES

被引:26
|
作者
LOCKWOOD, GM
PINKERTON, SM
BARLOW, DH
机构
[1] Nuffield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, John Radcliffe Hospital
关键词
BUSERELIN ACETATE; GNRH ANALOGS; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; NAFARELIN ACETATE; OVULATION INDUCTION;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a135930
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists to control ovulation induction cycles for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been shown to increase the pregnancy rate and live birth rate compared with non-analogue cycles. Different formulations of GnRH agonist are available with different routes and frequencies of administration. In this prospective study, the efficacy and safety of intranasal nafarelin and buserelin as adjunctive therapy during IVF were assessed. A total of 240 female patients were recruited to the study and in the first phase patients were randomized to receive either intranasal nafarelin 200 mu g twice daily or buserelin 200 mu g five times daily. In the second phase, patients received either nafarelin 400 mu g twice daily or buserelin 200 mu g five times daily. Nafarelin 400 mu g and buserelin 200 mu g both produced clinical pregnancy rates of 31% per recruit and 39% per embryo transfer. The rates for nafarelin 200 mu g were 23 and 37% respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy rates, by either drug or dosage. The time taken for pituitary down-regulation to be achieved was significantly longer on nafarelin 200 mu g than on either nafarelin 400 mu g or buserelin. The total number of days stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin required to reach criteria for human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration was significantly longer on buserelin than on either dose of nafarelin. Median serum oestradiol concentrations on the day of HCG administration were significantly higher on either dose of nafarelin than on buserelin.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF 2 GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONISTS, NAFARELIN ACETATE AND BUSERELIN ACETATE, IN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION-EMBRYO TRANSFER
    GOLDMAN, JA
    DICKER, D
    FELDBERG, D
    ASHKENAZI, J
    VOLIOWICH, I
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 (02) : 226 - 228
  • [2] IS LONG-PROTOCOL GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST ADMINISTRATION SUPERIOR TO THE SHORT PROTOCOL IN OVARIAN STIMULATION FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION
    TASDEMIR, M
    TASDEMIR, I
    KODAMA, H
    HIGUCHI, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY AND MENOPAUSAL STUDIES, 1995, 40 (01) : 25 - 28
  • [3] A prospective randomized comparison of routine buserelin acetate and a decreasing dosage of nafarelin acetate with a low-dose gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocol for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Takeuchi, S
    Minoura, H
    Shibahara, T
    Tsuiki, Y
    Noritaka, F
    Toyoda, N
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : 532 - 537
  • [4] ADMINISTRATION OF PROGESTOGENS TO HASTEN PITUITARY DESENSITIZATION AFTER THE USE OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST IN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SHAKER, AG
    PITTROF, R
    ZAIDI, J
    BEKIR, J
    KYEIMENSAH, A
    TAN, SL
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1995, 64 (04) : 791 - 795
  • [5] CUMULATIVE CONCEPTION AND LIVE-BIRTH RATES AFTER IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION WITH AND WITHOUT THE USE OF LONG, SHORT, AND ULTRASHORT REGIMENS OF THE GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST BUSERELIN
    TAN, SL
    MACONOCHIE, N
    DOYLE, P
    CAMPBELL, S
    BALEN, A
    BEKIR, J
    BRINSDEN, P
    EDWARDS, RG
    JACOBS, HS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 171 (02) : 513 - 520
  • [6] A randomized prospective study of early follicular or midluteal initiation of long protocol gonadotropin-releasing hormone in an in vitro fertilization program
    KondaveetiGordon, U
    Harrison, RF
    BarryKinsella, C
    Gordon, AC
    Drudy, L
    Cottell, E
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 66 (04) : 582 - 586
  • [7] A controlled trial of natural cycle versus microdose gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog flare cycles in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization
    Morgia, F
    Sbracia, M
    Schimberni, M
    Giallonardo, A
    Piscitelli, C
    Giannini, P
    Aragona, C
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (06) : 1542 - 1547
  • [8] AN EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE ANALOGS AND MEDROXYPROGESTERONE ACETATE ON UTERINE LEIOMYOMATA VOLUME BY MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, CROSSOVER TRIAL
    CARR, BR
    MARSHBURN, PB
    WEATHERALL, PT
    BRADSHAW, KD
    BRESLAU, NA
    BYRD, W
    ROARK, M
    STEINKAMPF, MP
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1993, 76 (05): : 1217 - 1223
  • [9] Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and medroxyprogesterone acetate on calcium metabolism: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
    Carr, BR
    Breslau, NA
    Peng, N
    Adams-Huet, B
    Bradshaw, KD
    Steinkampf, MP
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (05) : 1216 - 1223
  • [10] Progesterone protocol versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in vitro fertilization treatments with frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Zhu, Xiuxian
    Ye, Hongjuan
    Ye, Jing
    Fu, Yonglun
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (05)