MIN-MAX CONTROLLER OUTPUT CONFIGURATION TO IMPROVE MULTI-MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL WHEN DEALING WITH DISTURBANCE REJECTION

被引:9
|
作者
Wahid, Abdul [1 ]
Ahmad, Arshad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dept Chem Engn, Fac Engn, Kampus Baru UI Depok, Depok 16424, Indonesia
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Chem Engn, Dept Chem Engn, Johor Baru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Inst Future Energy, Ctr Hydrogen Energy, Johor Baru 81310, Johor, Malaysia
关键词
Configuration; Control; Distillation; Multi-model; Predictive;
D O I
10.14716/ijtech.v6i3.1139
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A Multiple Model Predictive Control (MMPC) approach is proposed to control a nonlinear distillation column. This control framework utilizes the best local linear models selected to construct the MMPC. The study was implemented on a multivariable nonlinear distillation column (Column A). The dynamic model of the Column A was simulated within MATLAB(R) programming and a SIMULINK(R) environment. The setpoint tracking and disturbance rejection performances of the proposed MMPC were evaluated and compared to a Proportional-Integral (PI) controller. Using three local models, the MMPC was proven more efficient in servo control of Column A compared to the PI controller tested. However, it was not able to cope with the disturbance rejection requirement. This limitation was overcome by introducing controller output configurations, as follows: Maximizing MMPC and PI Controller Output (called MMPCPIMAX). The controller output configurations of PI and single linear MPC (SMPC) have been proven to be able to improve control performance when the process was subjected to disturbance changes (F and z(F)). Compared to the PI controller, the first algorithm (MMPCPIMAX) provided better control performance when the disturbance sizes were moderate, but it was not able to handle a large disturbance of +50% in z(F).
引用
收藏
页码:504 / 515
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-model LQ-constrained min-max control
    Garcia, Pablo
    Poznyak, Alexander
    OPTIMAL CONTROL APPLICATIONS & METHODS, 2016, 37 (02): : 359 - 380
  • [2] Min-Max Economic Model Predictive Control
    Marquez, Alejandro
    Patino, Julian
    Espinosa, Jairo
    2014 IEEE 53RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2014, : 4410 - 4415
  • [3] Min-max piecewise constant optimal control for multi-model linear systems
    Miranda, Felix A.
    Castanos, Fernando
    Poznyak, Alexander
    IMA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CONTROL AND INFORMATION, 2016, 33 (04) : 1157 - 1176
  • [4] Comparison of Model Predictive Controller and Min-Max Approach for Aircraft Engine Fuel Control
    Montazeri-Gh, Morteza
    Rasti, Ali
    Imani, Amin
    2017 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, INSTRUMENTATION, AND AUTOMATION (ICCIA), 2017, : 331 - 336
  • [5] Min-max model predictive control as a quadratic program
    de la Pena, D. Munoz
    Alamo, T.
    Ramirez, D. R.
    Camacho, E. F.
    IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 1 (01): : 328 - 333
  • [6] Min-Max Model Predictive Control of a pilot plant
    Gruber, J. K.
    Ramirez, D. R.
    Alamo, T.
    Bordons, C.
    Camacho, E. F.
    2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, : 1115 - 1120
  • [7] Min-max coalitional model predictive control algorithm
    Maxim, Anca
    Maestre, Jose M.
    Caruntu, Constantin F.
    Lazar, Corneliu
    2019 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (CSCS), 2019, : 24 - 29
  • [8] Min-max model predictive control of a pilot plant
    Ramirez, D. R.
    Gruber, J. K.
    Alamo, T.
    Bordons, C.
    Camacho, E. F.
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE AUTOMATICA E INFORMATICA INDUSTRIAL, 2008, 5 (03): : 37 - +
  • [9] Comparison of model predictive controller and optimized min-max algorithm for turbofan engine fuel control
    Morteza Montazeri-Gh
    Ali Rasti
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33 : 5483 - 5498
  • [10] Comparison of model predictive controller and optimized min-max algorithm for turbofan engine fuel control
    Montazeri-Gh, Morteza
    Rasti, Ali
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (11) : 5483 - 5498