An Analysis of Online Evaluations on Physician-Rating Websites (PRW) at the Example of the German Integrated Healthcare Network "Quality and Efficiency"

被引:8
|
作者
Emmert, M. [1 ]
Gerstner, B. [1 ]
Sander, U. [2 ]
Wambach, V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ, Inst Management, Juniorprofessur Versorgungsmanagement, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Hsch Hannover, Abt Informat & Kommunikat, Fak III, Hannover, Germany
[3] Gesundheitsnetz QuE Nurnberg, Vorsitzender Vorstands, Hannover, Germany
来源
关键词
physician-rating websites; integrated healthcare work; public reporting; transparency;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1335899
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of the present studywas to investigate the current status of online physician evaluations on German PRWs. Therefore, we studied 106 physicians from the Integrated Healthcare Network "Quality and Efficiency", located in Nuremberg, Bavaria. Methods: 1. Five relevant German PRWs were chosen. 2. Data was collected for the 106 physicians on the five PRWs. Two authors independently carried out the data collection (date of data collection 08/11/2012). 3. Descriptive analysis was conducted addressing ten literature-based issues. 4. Discussion of our results with national and international published results. Results: The following German PRWs were considered: Arztauskunft, Imedo, Jameda, DocInsider, and the Weisse Liste. It could be shown that 96 % of all physicians could be identified on the websites. On average, 50 % of all physicians were rated at least once. However, great differences between the websites could be detected (Min 29 %, Max 81 %). The percentage of physicians with at least 5 respectively 10 ratings was calculated to be 17 % respectively 9 %. A mean of 3.08 ratings per physicians could be counted (range 0.45-9.03, SD 3.71). Most ratings were positive; approximately 75 % could be assigned to the best rating category and only 5 % to the worst rating category. Mean length of narrative comments was 28 words, 86 % were favorable. We could not find any evidence of " doctorbashing" or defamation. Conclusions: The number of online evaluations on German PRWs has been increasing. Both, the mean number of ratings as well as the percentage of rated physicians has further risen. The numbers determined exceed those from the US but, in general, are in line with respect to the nature and results of the ratings. However, our findings have to be interpreted with cautious since our analysis is based on a sample of physicians of a local German region.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 167
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites
    Meszmer, Nina
    Jaegers, Lena
    Schoeffski, Oliver
    Emmert, Martin
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2018, 131 : 73 - 80
  • [2] PATIENTS' EVALUATIONS OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS IN THE ERA OF SOCIAL NETWORKING: AN ANALYSIS OF PHYSICIAN-RATING WEBSITES
    Lagu, Tara
    Lindenauer, Peter
    Rothberg, Michael
    Hannon, Nicholas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 : 345 - 345
  • [3] Patients’ Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites
    Tara Lagu
    Nicholas S. Hannon
    Michael B. Rothberg
    Peter K. Lindenauer
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2010, 25 : 942 - 946
  • [4] Patients' Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites
    Lagu, Tara
    Hannon, Nicholas S.
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    Lindenauer, Peter K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 25 (09) : 942 - 946
  • [5] Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis
    Rothenfluh, Fabia
    Schulz, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (06)
  • [6] An Analysis of Online Evaluations on a Physician Rating Website: Evidence From a German Public Reporting Instrument
    Emmert, Martin
    Meier, Florian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (08)
  • [7] CAN PATIENTS RELY ON RESULTS OF PHYSICIAN RATING WEBSITES WHEN SELECTING A PHYSICIAN? - A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY ASSESSING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ONLINE RATINGS AND STRUCTURAL AND QUALITY OF CARE MEASURES FROM TWO GERMAN PHYSICIAN RATING WEBSITES
    Adelhardt, T.
    Emmert, M.
    Sander, U.
    Wambach, V
    Lindenthal, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A545 - A545
  • [8] A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites
    Emmert, Martin
    Adelhardt, Thomas
    Sander, Uwe
    Wambach, Veit
    Lindenthal, Joerg
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 15
  • [9] A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites
    Martin Emmert
    Thomas Adelhardt
    Uwe Sander
    Veit Wambach
    Jörg Lindenthal
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 15