Moderation of Cohesiveness between Proactive Personality and Extra-Role Behaviors

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Hsiao-Ling [1 ]
Lai, Fong-Yi [2 ]
Lai, Chun-Chin [3 ]
Kao, Yueh-Tzu [4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Business Adm, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Pingtung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Business Adm, Neipu, Taiwan
[3] New Taipei Municipal Lin Kou Senior High Sch, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, Dept Healthcare Adm, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
来源
NTU MANAGEMENT REVIEW | 2015年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
proactive personality; task cohesiveness; interpersonal cohesiveness; voice behavior; helping behavior;
D O I
10.6226/NTUMR.2015.JUN.OB10
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study utilized trait activation theory (TAT), social information processing theory, and the strong/weak situation hypothesis to examine the group-level effects of cohesiveness on relationships between proactive personality and voice/helping behavior. Two studies were conducted to test the research hypotheses. Study 1 used a multi-temporal point survey. Samples were drawn from questionnaires completed by 187 employees from 18 working groups. Study 2 used dyadic questionnaires, which were completed by 319 administrative school staff members and 48 of their supervisors from 29 high schools. Results of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) showed a moderating effect of group-level cohesiveness in both studies. Specifically, results indicated that a higher degree of task/interpersonal cohesiveness was positively associated with weaker relationships between proactive personality and voice/helping behavior. Based on the research findings, implications and suggestions for theories and practical implementations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 37
页数:37
相关论文
共 102 条
  • [1] COMBINED EFFECTS OF INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION AND GOAL-PATH CLARITY ON COHESIVENESS OF TASK ORIENTED GROUPS
    ANDERSON, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 31 (01) : 68 - 75
  • [2] Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control
    Ashford, SJ
    Black, JS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (02) : 199 - 214
  • [3] Aspinwall LG, 1997, PSYCHOL BULL, V121, P417, DOI 10.1037//0033-2909.121.3.417
  • [4] BACK K, 1950, THEORY EXPT SOCIAL C, P21
  • [5] THE PROACTIVE COMPONENT OF ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR - A MEASURE AND CORRELATES
    BATEMAN, TS
    CRANT, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (02) : 103 - 118
  • [6] SOCIAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING AND GROUP-INDUCED SHIFTS IN RESPONSES TO TASK DESIGN
    BATEMAN, TS
    GRIFFIN, RW
    RUBINSTEIN, D
    [J]. GROUP & ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 1987, 12 (01): : 88 - 108
  • [7] Bindl UK, 2011, APA HDB IND ORG PSYC, P567, DOI DOI 10.1037/12170-019
  • [8] Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P349, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
  • [9] Borman W.C., 1993, PERSONNEL SELECTION, P71, DOI DOI 10.1007/SPRINGERREFERENCE_7472
  • [10] An Exploratory Model of Interpersonal Cohesiveness in New Product Development Teams
    Brockman, Beverly K.
    Rawlston, Melissa E.
    Jones, Michael A.
    Halstead, Diane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 27 (02) : 201 - 219