DIAGNOSIS OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING VERSUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY

被引:183
|
作者
NIENABER, CA
SPIELMANN, RP
VONKODOLITSCH, Y
SIGLOW, V
PIEPHO, A
JAUP, T
NICOLAS, V
WEBER, P
TRIEBEL, HJ
BLEIFELD, W
机构
[1] UNIV HAMBURG,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,W-2000 HAMBURG 20,GERMANY
[2] UNIV HAMBURG,DEPT THORAC SURG,W-2000 HAMBURG 20,GERMANY
关键词
AORTIC DISSECTION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ANATOMIC MAPPING;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.85.2.434
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Aortic dissection requires prompt and reliable diagnosis to reduce the high mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of both ECG-triggered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography combined with color-coded Doppler flow imaging (TEE) for the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection and associated epiphenomena. Methods and Results. Fifty-three consecutive patients with clinically suspected aortic dissection were subjected to a dual noninvasive imaging protocol in random order; imaging results were compared and validated against the independent morphological "gold standard" of intraoperative findings (n = 27), necropsy (n = 7), and/or contrast angiography (n = 53). No serious side effects were encountered with either imaging method. In contrast to a precursory screening transthoracic echogram, the sensitivities of both MRI and TEE were 100% for detecting a dissection of the thoracic aorta irrespective of its location. The specificity of TEE, however, was lower than the specificity of MRI for a dissection (TEE, 68.2% versus MRI, 100%; p < 0.005), which resulted mainly from false-positive TEE findings confined to the ascending segment of the aorta (TEE, 78.8% versus MRI, 100%; p < 0.01). In addition, MRI proved to be more sensitive than TEE in detecting the formation of thrombus in the false lumen of both the aortic arch (p < 0.01) and the descending segment of the aorta (p < 0.05). There were no discrepancies between the two imaging techniques in detecting the site of entry to a dissection, aortic regurgitation, or pericardial effusion. Conclusions. Both MRI and TEE are atraumatic, safe, and highly sensitive methods to identify and classify acute and subacute dissections of the entire thoracic aorta. TEE, however, is associated with lower specificity for lesions in the ascending aorta. These results may still favor TEE as a semi-invasive diagnostic procedure after a precursory screening transthoracic echogram in suspected aortic dissection, but they establish MRI as an excellent method to avoid false-positive findings. Anatomic mapping by MRI may emerge as the most comprehensive approach and morphological standard to guide surgical interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 447
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SPIRAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, MULTIPLANE TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION
    SOMMER, T
    FEHSKE, W
    VONSMEKAL, A
    HOLZKNECHT, N
    GIESEKE, J
    KELLER, E
    WIRTZ, P
    STEUDEL, A
    SCHILD, H
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1995, 162 (02): : 104 - 111
  • [2] NONINVASIVE FOLLOW-UP (F/U) IN THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION - TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    NIENABER, CA
    ROTTIG, K
    BROCKHOFF, CJ
    LUND, G
    KOSCHYK, DH
    NICOLAS, V
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1994, 90 (04) : 585 - 585
  • [3] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING (MRI) FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION
    NIENABER, CA
    SPIELMANN, RP
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (04) : 125 - 125
  • [4] VALUE OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION
    NIENABER, CA
    VONKODOLITSCH, Y
    SPIELMANN, RP
    [J]. HERZ, 1992, 17 (06) : 338 - 347
  • [5] THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTION - DIAGNOSIS WITH TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY VERSUS MR-IMAGING
    LAISSY, JP
    BLANC, F
    SOYER, P
    ASSAYAG, P
    SIBERT, A
    TEBBOUNE, D
    ARRIVE, L
    BROCHET, E
    HVASS, U
    LANGLOIS, J
    MENU, Y
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (02) : 331 - 336
  • [6] Follow-up of chronic thoracic aortic dissection: Comparison of transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Masani, ND
    Banning, AP
    Jones, RA
    Ruttley, MST
    Fraser, AG
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1996, 131 (06) : 1156 - 1163
  • [7] TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF SACCULAR ANEURYSM OF THE TRANSVERSE THORACIC AORTA
    KAMP, O
    VANROSSUM, AC
    TORENBEEK, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1991, 33 (02) : 330 - 333
  • [8] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF CHRONIC AORTIC DISSECTION
    JUST, M
    MOHRKAHALY, S
    KREITNER, KF
    GREBE, P
    ERBEL, R
    MEYER, J
    THELEN, M
    [J]. FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NEUEN BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1993, 158 (02): : 109 - 114
  • [9] CHRONIC AORTIC DISSECTION - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING
    PERNES, JM
    GRENIER, P
    DESBLEDS, MT
    GAUX, JC
    [J]. ANNALES DE RADIOLOGIE, 1987, 30 (02) : 109 - 109
  • [10] MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THORACIC AORTIC DISSECTIONS
    SAX, SL
    [J]. TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 1990, 17 (04) : 262 - 270