The political texts constitute a type of practice conducive to the analysis of the speech, both linguistic and semiotic. The political texts analyzed in this paper correspond to the speeches made in the closures of campaign of the only two candidates for the presidency of the nation in Argentina in the past national elections (2007). The ways in which the annunciators organize their arguments, the resources jobs at stake, and the specific modes of legitimation, will be the key aspects to take into account in our work. As a result of the analysis we will show that the candidate and current President of Argentina, Cristina Fernandez, builds an enunciator epic that is legitimate through the appeal to the national heroes and the passionate games. On the other hand, Elisa Carrio builds an enunciator ethics which is legitimate through the National Constitution and appeals to the Republic. Both discursive strategies are dominant ways in our country to build political, in both ways of validating a language, a few arguments and a way to face the enunciatario. In order to reach these conclusions neccesary theoretical and methodological resources related to the semiotic textual and enunciation, as well as the sociocritical, with which will give you an account of the movement and discursive construction of two models of a country that the candidates say in speeches.
