GENETIC CORRELATION AND HERITABILITIES FOR PUREBRED AND CROSSBRED PERFORMANCE IN POULTRY EGG-PRODUCTION TRAITS

被引:0
|
作者
WEI, M [1 ]
VANDERWERF, HJ [1 ]
机构
[1] WAGENINGEN UNIV AGR,DEPT ANIM BREEDING,6700 AH WAGENINGEN,NETHERLANDS
关键词
CROSSBREEDING; EGG PRODUCTION; GENETIC PARAMETERS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POULTRY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance and purebred and crossbred heritabilities were estimated for egg production traits of laying chickens using a multivariate sire model accounting for additive relationships between sires, Two sire lines, denoted lines 1 and 2, were crossed to one dam line to produce crossbred progeny. Records for egg weight, egg specific gravity, and egg number were collected on purebred and crossbred hens. In total, 99 sires in line 1 and 292 sires in line 2 were used in the analysis, each sire producing on average 45 purebred and 105 crossbred daughters. Estimates of purebred heritability in Lines 1 and 2 were in range of .54 to .74 for egg number traits, .52 to .91 for egg weight traits, and .41 to .83 for egg specific gravity traits. Estimates of crossbred heritability were .04 to .51 for egg numbers, .23 to .45 for egg weight, and .13 to .31 for egg specific gravity. The sire component in crossbreds differed up to 78% from the sire component in purebreds depending on traits. The estimate of genetic correlation (Lpc) between purebred and crossbred performance was .56 to .73 for egg number, .69 to .99 for egg weight, and .72 to .82 for egg specific gravity. Although crossbred parameters were strongly affected by environmental factors, the results tend to agree with the theory that traits with a larger dominance variation and a larger difference between sire components in purebreds and crossbreds show a lower r(pc). Because the estimates of r(pc), were significantly lower than 2 for egg number and egg specific gravity, an optimal selection strategy should combine purebred and crossbred information for crossbred progress.
引用
收藏
页码:2220 / 2226
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic variation of egg production traits in purebred and crossbred laying hens
    Besbes, B
    Gibson, JP
    [J]. ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1999, 68 : 433 - 439
  • [2] Animal board invited review: The purebred-crossbred genetic correlation in poultry
    Calus, M. P. L.
    Wientjes, Y. C. J.
    Bos, J.
    Duenk, P.
    [J]. ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (11)
  • [3] Study of egg-production in poultry
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1917, 8 : 131 - 131
  • [4] PREDICTING POULTRY EGG-PRODUCTION
    ADAMS, CJ
    BELL, DD
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1980, 59 (04) : 937 - 938
  • [5] NORMALITY OF EGG-PRODUCTION IN POULTRY
    CLAYTON, GA
    [J]. BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1975, 16 (05) : 431 - 439
  • [6] SIMULATION OF POULTRY EGG-PRODUCTION
    WHITE, DH
    OLEARY, GJ
    BARTLETT, BE
    ABUSEREWA, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 1978, 3 (02) : 85 - 102
  • [7] GENETIC PROGRESS ACHIEVED IN COMMERCIAL BREEDING FOR EGG-PRODUCTION .1. TOTAL GENETIC CHANGE IN SOME EGG-PRODUCTION TRAITS
    KOLSTAD, N
    [J]. ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA, 1979, 29 (02): : 151 - 160
  • [8] Genetic parameters for reproductive traits in purebred and crossbred swine
    Kramer, Luke M.
    Wolc, Ania
    Esfandyari, Hadi
    Thekkoot, Dinesh
    Zhang, Chunyan
    Plastow, Graham
    Kemp, Bob
    Dekkers, Jack C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 11 - 11
  • [9] Genetic parameters and the purebred-crossbred genetic correlation for growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in pigs
    Esfandyari, Hadi
    Thekkoot, Dinesh M.
    Kemp, Robert A.
    Plastow, Graham S.
    Dekkers, Jack C. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 : 164 - 164
  • [10] Genetic correlations between feed efficiency traits, and growth performance and carcass traits in purebred and crossbred pigs
    Godinho, R. M.
    Bergsma, R.
    Silva, F. F.
    Sevillano, C. A.
    Knol, E. F.
    Lopes, M. S.
    Lopes, P. S.
    Bastiaansen, J. W. M.
    Guimaraes, S. E. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (03) : 817 - 829