Why genes are like lemons

被引:4
|
作者
Boem, F. [1 ]
Ratti, E. [2 ]
Andreoletti, M. [3 ,4 ]
Boniolo, G. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Oncol & Ematooncol, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Ctr Theol Sci & Human Flourishing, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Salute, Milan, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Dept Expt Oncol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Ferrara, Dipartimento Sci Biomed & Chirurg Specialistiche, Ferrara, Italy
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Adv Study, Munich, Germany
关键词
Gene; Theoretical terms; Natural kinds; Biological functions; Philosophy of science contribution to science;
D O I
10.1016/j.shpsc.2016.04.005
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
In the last few years, the lack of a unitary notion of gene across biological sciences has troubled the philosophy of biology community. However, the debate on this concept has remained largely historical or focused on particular cases presented by the scientific empirical advancements. Moreover, in the literature there are no explicit and reasonable arguments about why a philosophical clarification of the concept of gene is needed. In our paper, we claim that a philosophical clarification of the concept of gene does not contribute to biology. Unlike the question, for example, "What is a biological function?", we argue that the question "What is a gene?" could be answered by means of empirical research, in the sense that biologists' labour is enough to shed light on it. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 95
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条