CONGRESSIONAL SILENCE: A TOOL OF JUDICIAL SUPREMACY

被引：0

作者：

Horack, Frank E., Jr.

机构：

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：247 / 261

页数：15

共 50 条

[1] JUDICIAL SUPREMACY
HODGES, DC
[J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1958, 55 (03): : 101 - 111
[2] JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND JUDICIAL APPLICABILITY OF THE CONSTITUTION IN THE UNITED STATES: OBJECTIONS TO THE JUDICIAL SUPREMACY.
Silva Irarrazaval, Luis Alejandro
[J]. ESTUDIOS CONSTITUCIONALES, 2012, 10 (01): : 117 - 144
[3] Judicial Supremacy and the End of Judicial Restraint
Kramer, Larry D.
[J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2012, 100 (03) : 621 - 634
[4] THE STRUGGLE FOR JUDICIAL SUPREMACY
Biddle, Francis
[J]. HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1941, 54 (05) : 896 - 898
[5] The struggle for judicial supremacy
Hope, Theodore S., Jr.
[J]. CORNELL LAW QUARTERLY, 1941, 26 (04): : 746 - 747
[6] THE STRUGGLE FOR JUDICIAL SUPREMACY
Voorhees, Dayton
[J]. NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY REVIEW, 1941, 19 (01): : 101 - 102
[7] On the struggle for judicial supremacy
Knight, J
Epstein, L
[J]. LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW, 1996, 30 (01) : 87 - 120
[8] The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy
Schmidt, Benno C.
[J]. TEXAS LAW REVIEW, 1941, 19 (04) : 527 - 533
[9] THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL SUPREMACY
MENDELSON, W
[J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1961, 4 (01): : 175 - 185
[10] Nationhood and Judicial Supremacy
Nagel, Robert F.
[J]. THAT EMINENT TRIBUNAL: JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND THE CONSTITUTION, 2004, : 20 - 36