Cost Analysis of an Office-based Surgical Suite

被引:2
|
作者
LaBove, Gabrielle [1 ]
Davison, Steven P. [2 ]
机构
[1] DAVinci Plast Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/GOX.0000000000000831
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Operating costs are a significant part of delivering surgical care. Having a system to analyze these costs is imperative for decision making and efficiency. We present an analysis of surgical supply, labor and administrative costs, and remuneration of procedures as a means for a practice to analyze their cost effectiveness; this affects the quality of care based on the ability to provide services. The costs of surgical care cannot be estimated blindly as reconstructive and cosmetic procedures have different percentages of overhead. Methods: A detailed financial analysis of office-based surgical suite costs for surgical procedures was determined based on company contract prices and average use of supplies. The average time spent on scheduling, prepping, and doing the surgery was factored using employee rates. Results: The most expensive, minor procedure supplies are suture needles. The 4 most common procedures from the most expensive to the least are abdominoplasty, breast augmentation, facelift, and lipectomy. Conclusions: Reconstructive procedures require a greater portion of collection to cover costs. Without the adjustment of both patient and insurance remuneration in the practice, the ability to provide quality care will be increasingly difficult.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Establishment and cost analysis of an office surgical suite
    Way, JC
    Culham, BA
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 39 (05) : 379 - 383
  • [2] Cost analysis of office-based transnasal esophagoscopy
    David J. Wellenstein
    Jimmie Honings
    Henrieke W. Schutte
    Jasmijn M. Herruer
    Frank J. A. van den Hoogen
    Henri A. M. Marres
    Robert P. Takes
    Guido B. van den Broek
    [J]. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 1457 - 1463
  • [3] Cost analysis of office-based transnasal esophagoscopy
    Wellenstein, David J.
    Honings, Jimmie
    Schutte, Henrieke W.
    Herruer, Jasmijn M.
    van den Hoogen, Frank J. A.
    Marres, Henri A. M.
    Takes, Robert P.
    van den Broek, Guido B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (05) : 1457 - 1463
  • [4] Are Office-Based Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Procedures Profitable? A Benefit-Cost Analysis
    Jones, Jason P.
    Ellis, Edward, III
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (11) : 2205 - 2214
  • [5] Office-based endovascular suite is safe for most procedures
    Jain, Krishna
    Munn, John
    Rummel, Mark C.
    Johnston, Dan
    Longton, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (01) : 186 - 191
  • [6] Office-Based Endovascular Suite Is Safe for Most Procedures
    Jain, Krishna M.
    Munn, John
    Rummel, Mark
    Johnston, Dan
    Longton, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 292 - 292
  • [7] SURGICAL OFFICE-BASED ULTRASOUND OF THE BREAST
    STAREN, ED
    [J]. AMERICAN SURGEON, 1995, 61 (07) : 619 - 627
  • [8] Cost analysis of office-based and operating room procedures in rhinology
    Prickett, Kara K.
    Wise, Sarah K.
    DelGaudio, John M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM OF ALLERGY & RHINOLOGY, 2012, 2 (03) : 207 - 211
  • [9] COST ANALYSIS COMPARING OR TO OFFICE-BASED HYDROCELE AND SPERMATOCELE EXCISION
    Wymer, K.
    Kohler, T.
    Trost, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2020, 17 (01): : S89 - S90
  • [10] Use of preoperative subcutaneous ''wetting solution'' and epidural block anesthesia for liposuction in the office-based surgical suite
    Knize, DM
    Fishell, R
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 100 (07) : 1867 - 1874