Odor detection threshold (ODT) and odor rejection threshold (ORT) determination of sotolon in Madeira wine: A preliminary study

被引:5
|
作者
Gaspar, Joao M. [1 ]
Pereira, Vanda [1 ,2 ]
Marques, Jose C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Madeira, Fac Exact Sci & Engn, Campus Penteada, P-9020105 Funchal, Portugal
[2] Univ Aveiro, I3N, Aveiro, Portugal
来源
AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD | 2018年 / 3卷 / 03期
关键词
fortified wine; wine key-aromas; sensory analysis; 3-alternative forced choice; paired preference test;
D O I
10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.172
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Madeira is a fortified wine, well renowned worldwide. It is during the aging process that its characteristic bouquet is developed, through the formation of specific aromas. Sotolon (3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethyl-2(5H)-furanone) is frequently pointed out as one of the molecules responsible for the aroma of the finest Madeiras. The present work serves as a preliminary insight on the sensorial impact of this compound in Madeira wine. The odor detection threshold of sotolon in a sweet-type Madeira was obtained by the 3-Alternative Forced Choice method. The estimated threshold value was obtained by 19 non-trained and non-expert panelists, within the spiked range 4-314 mu g/L. An odor threshold of 112 mu g/L was obtained using a 3-year-old Madeira with 6.3 +/- 0.4 mu g/L endogenous sotolon. This result is about 6-fold higher than those previously reported for other fortified wines. A Paired Preference test was chosen to determine the concentration at which the panelists would reject the wine spiked with sotolon. Nineteen panelists assessed a series of spiked concentrations ranging from 253-3464 mu g/L. Within this range, it is not possible to define the concentration value from which the aroma of sotolon it is no longer pleasant. Thus, an odor rejection threshold could not be obtained. Indeed, the study also suggests that sotolon does not become unpleasant at higher concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 180
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Inferring odor detection threshold (ODT) using chemical structure based properties
    Shin, Jae Hong
    Ahnert, Sebastian E.
    Wild, David J.
    Ahn, Yong-Yeol
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 245
  • [2] Determination of Odor Detection Threshold in the Gottingen Minipig
    Sondergaard, Lene Vammen
    Holm, Ida E.
    Herskin, Mette S.
    Dagnaes-Hansen, Frederik
    Johansen, Marianne G.
    Jorgensen, Arne Lund
    Ladewig, Jan
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2010, 35 (08) : 727 - 734
  • [3] A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold
    Charlotte Bontempi
    Laurence Jacquot
    Gérard Brand
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [4] A study on the relationship between odor hedonic ratings and individual odor detection threshold
    Bontempi, Charlotte
    Jacquot, Laurence
    Brand, Gerard
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [5] Odor detection threshold, but not odor identification, is impaired in children with autism
    Iva Dudova
    Jan Vodicka
    Marketa Havlovicova
    Zdenek Sedlacek
    Tomas Urbanek
    Michal Hrdlicka
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2011, 20 : 333 - 340
  • [6] Odor detection threshold, but not odor identification, is impaired in children with autism
    Dudova, Iva
    Vodicka, Jan
    Havlovicova, Marketa
    Sedlacek, Zdenek
    Urbanek, Tomas
    Hrdlicka, Michal
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 20 (07) : 333 - 340
  • [7] ODOR THRESHOLD DETERMINATION FOR 2-NITROPROPANE
    CRAWFORD, GN
    GARRISON, RP
    MCFEE, DR
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1984, 45 (02): : B7 - B8
  • [8] Protocol for quantifying the odor detection threshold of mice
    Johnson, Chloe Elise
    Williams, Ellie
    Dewan, Adam
    STAR PROTOCOLS, 2023, 4 (04):
  • [9] Psychometrics of odor quality discrimination: Method for threshold determination
    Olsson, MJ
    Cain, WS
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2000, 25 (05) : 493 - 499
  • [10] Determination of the odor threshold concentrations of chlorobrominated Anisoles in water
    Diaz, A
    Fabrellas, C
    Ventura, F
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2005, 53 (02) : 383 - 387